This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Considerations When Performing Icing Wind Tunnel Testing to Determine Critical Temperature
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 16, 2003 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Critical temperature is defined as the threshold free stream air temperature at which ice will no longer accrete on a structure even though supercooled water is present in the air stream. Many factors determine the critical temperature, including airspeed, geometry of the accreting body, attitude of the body relative to airflow direction, thermal history of the body, liquid water content, and evaporative, convective, conductive and radiative heat transfer mechanisms operating at the accreting surface. A recent Certification Review Item issued by the Joint Aviation Authorities has highlighted the importance of understanding critical temperature characteristics of accretion-based probe-type ice detectors and the monitored surfaces they protect. Icing wind tunnels are perhaps the best available tool for characterizing critical temperature.
If critical temperatures of structures are being compared under like icing conditions, there is a high likelihood that differences will be small - perhaps on the order of 1° to 2°C or even less. Unfortunately, even the best icing wind tunnels can introduce errors of this order. In more conventional tunnel experiments run at colder temperatures to assess ice shapes, this level of uncertainty would usually be acceptable, whereas it typically would not be when assessing critical temperature. It is therefore especially important when characterizing critical temperature to recognize and address to the greatest degree practical the multiple contributors to uncertainty. Even when all reasonable steps are taken, uncertainty at the test article location(s) may still be greater than desired. This paper notes the major sources of uncertainty within the icing wind tunnel environment, and addresses considerations and practices to minimize their impact.
CitationSeverson, J., "Considerations When Performing Icing Wind Tunnel Testing to Determine Critical Temperature," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2120, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2120.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Wright, W.B., “User Manual for the NASA Glenn Ice Accretion Code LEWICE Version 2.0”, NASA/CR-1999-209409, September 1999
- Draft of in-process SAE document “Calibration and Acceptance of Icing Wind Tunnels”
- Gonsalez, J.C., Arrington, A.E. and Curry, M.R. III, “Aero-Thermal Calibration of the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel (2000 Tests)”, AIAA Paper 2001-0233, January 2001
- Oleskiw, M.M., Hyde, F.H. and Penna, P.J, “In Flight Icing Simulation Capabilities of NRC's Altitude Icing Wind Tunnel”, AIAA Paper 2001 0094, January 2001
- Willbanks, C.E. and Schulz, R.I., “Analytical Study of Icing Simulation for Turbine Engines in Altitude Test Cells, Engine Test Facility”, Arnold Engineering Development Center, AEDC-TR-73-144, November 1973
- Jackson, D.G., Cronin,D.J., Severson, J.A. and Owens, D.G., “Ludlam Limit Considerations on Cylinder Ice Accretion: Aerodynamics and Thermodynamics”, AIAA Paper 2001-0679, January 2001
- Anderson, D.N. and Ruff, G.A., “Scaling Methods for Simulating Aircraft In-Flight Icing Encounters”, NASA Technical Memorandum 107538, Prepared for the Second International Symposium on Scale Modeling, October 1997
- Shapiro, A.H. “The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow”, Volume I, p. 83, The Ronald Press Company, 1953
- Stickney, T.M, Shedlov, M.W. and Thompson, D.I. “Total Temperature Sensors Technical Report 5755”, Goodrich Sensor Systems, 1994
- Powell, R.L., Hall, W.J., Hylink, C.H., Sparks, L.L., Burns, G.W., Scroger, M.G., and Plumb, H.H. “NBS Monograph 125 Thermocouple Reference Tables Based on the IPTS-68”, U.S. Department of Commerce, March 1974