This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Tools for Integration of Analysis and Testing
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 05, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The automotive vehicle design process has relied for many years on both analytical studies and physical testing. Testing remains to be required due to the inherent complexities of structures and systems and the simplifications made in analytical studies. Simulation test methods, i.e. tests that load components with forces derived from actual operating conditions, have become the accepted standard. Advanced simulation tools like iterative deconvolution methods have been developed to address this need. Analytical techniques, such as multi body simulation have advanced to the degree that it is practical to investigate the dynamic behavior of components and even full vehicles under the influence of operational loads. However, the approach of testing and analysis are quite unique and no seamless bridge between the two exists.
This paper demonstrates an integrated approach to combine testing and analysis together in the form of virtual testing. Multi body simulation software  was used for multi body simulation of both the component under investigation as well as the test equipment used for physical testing. Road load simulation software  was used to reproduce field observed data on both the physical and virtual test rigs. There are two main advantages to this approach. The integrated application of physical and virtual tools allows the user to conduct virtual tests prior to having physical prototypes available. This accelerates the design process and can reduce cost. Secondly, by using a common framework for all physical and virtual investigations, the results remain comparable and trouble shooting of both domains is facilitated. This paper presents the results of a study of a vehicle mounted refrigeration unit. Observed failures in both physical and virtual tests corresponded very closely with respect to location and time to failure.
CitationYou, S., Leser, C., and Young, E., "Tools for Integration of Analysis and Testing," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1606, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1606.
- MSC.Software Corporation, MSC.ADAMS User Guide, 2002.
- MTS Systems Corporation, RPC Pro User Manual, 2002.
- Grote, P., Grenier, G. “Taking the Test Track to the Lab”, Automotive Engineering, June 1987, Volume 95, Number 6.
- Grote, P.,Fash J. W., “Integration of Structural Dynamics Testing and Durability Analysis” Sound and Vibration, April 1987.
- Fash, J. W., Goode, J. G., Brown, R. G., “Advanced Simulation Testing Capabilities”, SAE 921066, 1992.
- Soderling, S., Sharp, M., Leser, C.“On Servocontroller Compensation methods,”SAE1999-01-3000, 1999.
- Cryer B.W., Nawrocki P.E. and Lund R.A.: “A Road Simulation System for Heavy Duty Vehicles”, SAE Paper 760361, Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition, February 1976.
- Englerth, M., Dutton D. Grenier, G., Leese, G.“The Use of Fatigue Sensitive Critical Location in Correlation of Vehicle Simulation and In-Service Environments” SAE Technical Paper, 880807, 1988.
- Dittmann, K. J., Albright, F. J., Leser, C.“Validation of Virtual Prototypes via a Virtual Test Laboratory,”1st European MSC.ADAMS User Conference, 13-14 November, 2002, London, England.
- nCode International, FE Fatigue User Manual, 2002.