This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effectiveness of High-Retention Seats in Preventing Fatality: Initial Results and Trends
Technical Paper
2003-01-1351
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In 1995, new seat specifications were adopted by GM to provide high retention and improve occupant safety in rear crashes. With more than five years of phase-in of high retention (HR) seats, an analysis of FARS was undertaken to determine the initial field performance of HR seats in preventing fatalities. The 1991-2000 FARS was sorted for fatal rear-impacted vehicles. Using a VIN decoder, GM vehicles with HR front seats were sorted from those with baseline (pre-HR) seats. The fatal rear-impacted vehicle crashes were subdivided into several groups for analysis: 1) single-vehicle rear impacts, 2) two-vehicle rear crashes involving light striking vehicles, and 3) two-vehicle crashes involving heavy trucks and tractor-trailers, and multi-vehicle (3+) rear crashes.
While more field data is needed to increase confidence in the results, FARS analysis shows that high-retention seats reduce the risk of driver fatalities in single-vehicle rear crashes by 50% (-26%, 80%, ±95% CI) and driver/RF deaths by 59% (11%, 81%). For two-vehicle rear-impact crashes, high-retention seats reduce the risk of driver death by 54% (-23%, 83%) and driver/RF deaths by 35% (-38%, 70%) when impacted by light vehicles. There is no difference in risk with heavy truck or tractor-trailer impacts or in multi-vehicle (3+ vehicles involved) crashes. The new generation of seats was developed for high retention based on a perimeter seat frame design that allows the occupant to penetrate between the side frames of the seatback giving a “yielding” performance and pocketing of the pelvis. This increases retention and provides uniform support for the spine. The new generation of seats also includes a higher and more forward placement of the head restraint to reduce neck extension-related injury. That aspect of the seat performance cannot be studied with the FARS data.
The initial trends show that high-retention seats are effective in reducing the risk of fatal injury in single vehicle and light vehicle-to-vehicle rear impacts.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Viano, D., "Effectiveness of High-Retention Seats in Preventing Fatality: Initial Results and Trends," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1351, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1351.Also In
SAE 2003 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
References
- Cantor A Petition for Rulemaking to Amend FMVSS 207 to Prohibit Ramping Up the Seat Back of an Occupant During a Collision National Highway Traffic Safety Administration December 28 1989
- Evans L Traffic Safety and the Driver Van Nostrand Reinhold NY 0-442-00163-0 1991
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards No. 202, 207, and 301 49 Code of Federal Regulations Section 571.21 1968
- James MB Strother CE Warner CY et al Occupant Protection in Rear-end Collisions: Safety and Priorities and Seat Belt Effectiveness 21 Stapp Car Crash Conf SAE 912913 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 369 376 1991
- Linder A Bergman U Svensson M Viano DC Evaluation of the BioRID P3 and the Hybrid III in Pendulum Impacts to the Back – A Comparison to Human Subject Test Data Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automot. Med. Conf. 44 283 97 2000 Traffic Injury Prevention 3 2 158 165 2002
- Malliaris AC Current Issues of Occupant Protection in Car Rear Impacts Data Link, Inc NHTSA Docket 89-20-No1-021 February 1990
- Parenteau C Viano DC Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part II: Children, Toddlers and Infants SAE 2003-03B-145 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Prasad P Kim A Weerappuli DPV Robert V Schneider D Relationship Between Passenger Car Sat Back Strength and Occupant Injury Severity in Rear End Collisions: Field and Laboratory Studies SAE 973343 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1997
- Rake B Boehm S Auto Seat Systems: Dangerous Safety Restraints? April Issue 80 87 1990
- Saczalski KJ Petition to Improve FMVSS 207 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration April 18 1989
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Backrest and Head Restraint Design for Rear-end Collision Protection SAE 680079 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1968a
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Preliminary findings of head support designs 11th Stapp Car Crash Conf SAE 670921 SAE Warrendale PA 337 405 1967a
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Vehicle Design for Passenger Protection from High Speed Rear End Collisions SAE 680774 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1968b
- Severy DM Harrison MB Baird JD Collision Performance, LM Safety Car SAE 670458 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1967b
- Severy DM Mathewson JH Bechtol CO Controlled Automotive Rear-End Collisions, An Investigation of Related Engineering and Medical Phenomena Canadian Services Medical Journal VII 727 759 1955
- Stephens GD Long TJ Blaisdell DM Energy Analysis of Automotive Seat Systems SAE 2000-01-1380 , SP-1494 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2000
- Strother CE James MB Evaluation of Seat Back Strength and Seat Belt Effectiveness in Rear End Impacts 31st Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE 872214 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 225 244 1987
- USPTO High-Retention Seat Back US Patent 5,295,729 March 22 1994
- USPTO Seatback Load Applying Device US Patent 5,379,646 January 10 1995a European Patent EP 0646 782 January 28 1998a
- USPTO Vehicle Pivotal Headrest US Patent 5,378,043 January 3 1995b European Patent EP 0627 340 October 15 1997
- USPTO Vehicle Seat with Integral, Load Limiting Belt System US Patent 5,823,627 October 20 1998 European Patent EP 0870 652 A2 October 14 1998b
- USPTO Vehicle Seat with Perimeter Frame and Pelvic Catcher US Patent 5,509,716 April 23 1996 European Patent EP 0715 985 A2 June 12 1996
- Viano D Davidsson J Neck Displacements of Volunteers, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III in Rear Impacts: Implications to Whiplash Assessment by a Neck Displacement Criterion (NDC) Traffic Injury Prevention 3 (2) 105 116 2002
- Viano D Olsen S The Effectiveness of Active Head Restraint in Preventing Whiplash Journal of Trauma 51 959 969 November 2001
- Viano DC Hardy WN King AI Human Head, Neck and Torso Response to Pendulum Impacts on the Back Crash Prevention and Injury Control 2 4 289 306 2001
- Viano DC Role of the Seat in Rear Crash Safety SAE Book 0-7680-0847-6 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1 491 2002
- Viano DC High-Retention Seat Performance in Quasistatic Seat Tests SAE 2003-01-0173 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Viano D.C. Olsen S. Locke G.S. Humer M. “Neck Biomechanical Responses with Active Head Restraint Systems: Rear Barrier Tests with BioRID and Sled Tests with Hybrid III.” SAE 2002-01-0030 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2002
- Warner C Strother C James MB Decker RL Occupant Protection in Rear-End Collisions II: The Role of Seat Back Deformation in Injury Reduction 35th Stapp Car Crash Conf SAE 912914 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA. 1991