This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
On the Influence of the Near Wall Formulation of Turbulence Models for Prediction of Aerodynamic Coefficients for Ground Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Numerical and modeling errors in computational aerodynamics consist of multiple components. Previous investigations at Volvo have shown that low Reynolds k-ε models generally give better levels in pressure over the rear base area of the car than the corresponding wall function based model. However, these computations were carried out on car shapes without wheels. This paper presents numerical simulations of the flow field around three versions of the Volvo validation car series (VRAK). The geometry is a typical car with flat floor and simplified tires. The three car models differ by their rear shape. The configurations are: one with a nearly flat base, a fastback with a sloping rear window, and a car with a roof wing.
The influence of the near wall formulation of the standard k-ε model on drag and lift is investigated. The performance of the low Reynolds number version of the cubic k-ε model by Suga  is also investigated. The results from the simulations are compared with each other and with experimental data in terms of aerodynamic drag, lift and surface pressure. Sensitivity to boundary conditions and grid resolution is reported. The low Reynolds number linear k-ε model investigated here is numerically robust, and nearly grid independent solutions are obtained. This model gives a higher contribution to drag from the front of the car than the other models tested. The study indicates that the low Reynolds number version of the cubic k-ε model by Suga  is well suited for drag predictions on basic car shapes.
CitationBorg, A., Perzon, S., and Roditcheva, O., "On the Influence of the Near Wall Formulation of Turbulence Models for Prediction of Aerodynamic Coefficients for Ground Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1317, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1317.
- Ramnefors M. Bensryd R. Holmberg E. Perzon S. 1996 Accuracy of Drag Predictions on Cars using CFD Effect of Grid Refinement and Turbulence Models, SAE technical paper 960681
- Perzon S. Sjögren T. 1998 Accuracy in Computational Aerodynamics, Part 2:Base Pressure SAE technical paper 980038
- Axelsson N. Ramnefors M. Gustafson R. 1998 Accuracy in Computational Aerodynamics, Part 1: Stagnation Pressure SAE Technical Paper 931896
- Perzon S. Davidson L. 2000 On Transient Modeling of the Flow Around Vehicles Using the Reynolds Equations ACFD 2000 Beijing Oct 17-20 2000 China Wu J.- H. Zhu Z.-J. Jia F.-P. Wen X.-B. Hu W. 720 727
- Krajnovic S. Davidson L. 2001 Large eddy simulation of the flow around a ground vehicle body SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0702
- Lien F 1992 Computational modeling of 3D flow in complex ducts and passages Doctoral thesis University of Manchester, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Manchester, UK
- Suga K. 1995 Development and application of a non- linear eddy viscosity model sensitized to stress and strain invariants Doctoral thesis University of Manchester, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Manchester, UK