This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reference Static and Dynamic Pressures in Automotive Wind Tunnels
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The reference pressures are determined in automotive wind tunnels by measurement of pressures and pressure differences at upstream positions along the wind tunnel nozzle. For closed wall wind tunnels usually the so called nozzle method is used, where the volume flux is calculated from a pressure difference measured at the nozzle contour and a calibration factor determined in the empty test section. For open jet wind tunnels a choice is available between nozzle and plenum method. For the plenum method the reference static pressure is taken from the plenum chamber and the dynamic pressure also refers to the plenum conditions. The static reference pressure in closed wall tunnels is calculated by subtracting the dynamic pressure from the total pressure in the settling chamber.
In this paper, the definitions and the differences between the two methods are discussed in detail. Possible sources of errors, such as velocity-dependent calibration factors, interference with boundary layer suction and empty test section velocity distribution are discussed. Special focus will be laid on the investigation of the interference of model displacement (blockage) and measured dynamic pressure. It will be shown, that local effects of the pressure build up in front of the model usually do not affect the accuracy of the measured dynamic pressure.
Nevertheless model blockage does affect the measured results for aerodynamic forces as well as for pressure distributions. A short discussion of the sources of errors and of possible theoretical corrections to force coefficients and pressure distributions will be given. In this case special focus will be laid on the influence of the distance between model and nozzle in an open jet wind tunnel. The measured effect on the pressure distribution of a vehicle will be analysed and it will be shown, that neither nozzle nor plenum method deliver correct pressure distribution results without additional correction, if the blockage level is high.
CitationNijhof, B. and Wickern, G., "Reference Static and Dynamic Pressures in Automotive Wind Tunnels," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0428, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0428.
SAE 2003 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
- BARLOW, J.B. RAE, W.H. POPE, A. Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing John Wiley & Sons New York 1999
- PANKHURST, R. C. HOLDER, D. W. Wind tunnel technique Pitman London 1965
- HUCHO, W.-H. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles 4th SAE Detroit 1998
- KÜNSTNER, R. DEUTENBACH, K.-R. VAGT, J.-D. Measurement of Reference Dynamic Pressure in Open-Jet Automotive Wind Tunnels SAE Technical Paper 920344 1992
- COOPER, K.R. Closed-test-section wind tunnel blockage corrections for road vehicles SAE SP-1176 Warrendale 1996
- LINDENER, N. open jet-test-section wind tunnel blockage corrections for road vehicles SAE SP-1176 Warrendale 1996
- WICKERN, G. On the Application of Classical Wind Tunnel Corrections for Automotive Bodies SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0633 Detroit 2000
- MERCKER, E. WICKERN, G. WIEDEMANN, J. Contemplation of nozzle blockage in open jet wind tunnel in view of different ‘q’ determination techniques SAE Technical Paper 970136 Detroit 1997
- MERCKER, E. WIEDEMANN, J. On the Correction of Interference Effects in Open Jet Wind Tunnel SAE Technical Paper 960671 Detroit 1996
- KOPP, S. TU München 1997
- Wickern, G. Lindener, N. The Audi Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel: Final Design and First Operational Experience SAE 2000-01-0868 2000
- Hoffman, J.A. Martindale, B. Arnette, S.A. Williams, J. Wallis, S. The Effect of Test Section Configuration on Aerodynamic Drag Measurements SAE 2001-01-0631 2001