This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Robust Engine Design Using Engine Simulations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
During the design stage, certification testing, or in field problem solving, t is of value for engine designers and engineers to have an understanding of how robust the engine design is to variation in the manufacturing process, in-use wear, controller and the testing processes. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis is performed on a parametric GTpower diesel engine model and using Robust Design methods NOx defects are reduced.
Sensitivity analysis is conducted using a Plackett-Burman DOE. The DOE is performed on a 6 cylinder, direct-injection, turbocharged diesel engine model in GTpower, while Minitab is used for the experimental design and the factorial sensitivity analysis.
It was found that the NOx population distribution was unacceptably high, yielding a 7.4% defect rate relative to an upper control limit of 5 (g/kw-hr). The sensitivity analysis provided a parameter ranking which allowed the identification of the vital few factors which were controlling the NOx and SFC populations.
While timing retard of 1 degree could reduce the NOx defect rate to an acceptable “three sigma level” of 0.135% or only 135 NOx defects in 100,000 engines, it simultaneously caused an unacceptable 1% increase in fuel consumption.
Alternatively, the Response Surface Optimization (RSM) method was used within AutoDOE to re-optimize the key parameter settings to not only reduce the NOx defect rate to “three sigma”, but do it without loss of fuel consumption.
This work demonstrates that sensitivity analysis and Robust Design & Optimization methods allow engine designers an efficient way to understand the impact of variability on engine performance for the entire production population and to control the engine performance to meet emissions requirements with less loss of fuel consumption than with one-at-a-time modifications to nominal design settings alone.
CitationDave, A. and Hampson, G., "Robust Engine Design Using Engine Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0371, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0371.
- Moffat, Greg “Statistical Analysis in Design of Experimental Hardware,” Training Manual for the Solar Energy Research Institute 1987
- Assanis, D.N. Heywood J.B. “Development and Use of a Computer Simulation of the Turbo-compounded Diesel System for Engine Performance and Component Heat Transfer Studies,” SAE Technical Paper Series 860329 1986
- Morel, T. et. al. GTpower Engine Simulation Software, Gamma Technologies, Version 5.1 Westmont, IL November 2000 www.gtisoft.com
- Hampson, G.J. Mather D. “12 Run Plackett-Burman Analysis of Engine Simulations for NOx Reduction,” Foster D. IC Engines Class, Engine Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 1995
- Roy, R. K. Design of Experiments using the Taguchi Approach John Wiley & Sons New York 2001
- Montgomery, D.T. Reitz R.D. “Optimization of Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Operating Parameters Using A Response Surface Method,” SAE Paper 2000-01-1962 2000
- Minitab 12.2 1998 www.Minitab.com
- AutoDOE August 2002 Quality Engineering & Software Technologies 24655 Southfield Road, Southfield, MI 48075 www.quest-global.com