This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Particulate Matter and Aldehyde Emissions from Idling Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
As part of a multi-agency study concerning emissions and fuel consumption from heavy-duty diesel truck idling, Oak Ridge National Laboratory personnel measured CO, HC, NOx, CO2, O2, particulate matter (PM), aldehyde and ketone emissions from truck idle exhaust. Two methods of quantifying PM were employed: conventional filters and a Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM). A partial flow micro-dilution tunnel was used to dilute the sampled exhaust to make the PM and aldehyde measurements. The work was performed at the U.S. Army's Aberdeen Test Center's (ATC) climate controlled chamber. ATC performed 37 tests on five class-8 trucks (model years ranging from 1992 to 2001). One was equipped with an 11 hp diesel auxiliary power unit (APU), and another with a diesel direct-fired heater (DFH). The APU powers electrical accessories, heating, and air conditioning, whereas a DFH heats the cab in cold weather. Both devices offer an alternative to extended truck-engine idling. Exhaust emission measurements were also made for the APU and DFH. Trucks were idled at a high and low engine speed in the following environments: 32 °C (90 °F) with cabin air conditioning on, -18 °C (0 °F) with the cabin heater on, and 18 °C (65 °F) with no accessories on. ATC test technicians adjusted the air conditioning or heater to maintain a target cabin temperature of 21 °C (70 °F). Each test was run for approximately three hours.
Comparison of the results from the APU to those from the idling trucks implies that use of an APU to replace truck idling gives fuel savings (and CO2 reduction) on the order of 60-85%, 50-97% reductions in NOx, CO and HC, and PM reductions of -20% to 95%. PM emissions from the APU were higher than the “best” idling truck engine cases. The diesel-fired heater had significantly lower emissions and fuel consumption than the APU. The potential for fuel savings and environmental benefits are readily apparent.
Results for PM emissions showed a wide range of emissions rates from <1 g/hr to over 20 g/hr, with the newest trucks in the 1-5 g/hr range. PM emissions generally decreased with an increase in ambient temperature and increased disproportionately with an increase in engine speed. Aldehyde mass emissions rate increased with both decreasing temperature and increasing engine speed. The mass emissions rate of regulated gaseous species generally increased with increasing engine speed. A comparison of PM measurements with the TEOM and the filter-based methods is presented.
- Dominic J. Retrossa - Aberdeen Test Center
- John M. E. Storey - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- John F. Thomas - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Samuel A. Lewis - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Thang Q. Dam - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- K. Dean Edwards - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Gerald L. DeVault - Y-12 National Security Complex
CitationStorey, J., Thomas, J., Lewis, S., Dam, T. et al., "Particulate Matter and Aldehyde Emissions from Idling Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0289, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0289.
Diesel Emission Measurement, Modeling, & Control from the SAE 2003 World Congress on CD-ROM
Number: SP-1754CD; Published: 2003-03-03
Number: SP-1754CD; Published: 2003-03-03
- Stodolsky F. Gaines L. Vyas A. “Analysis of Technology Options to Reduce the Fuel Consumption of Idling Trucks,” Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne IL 2000
- Pekula N. Kuritz B. Hearne J. Marchese A. J. Hesketh R. P. The Effect of Ambient Temperature, Humidity, and Engine Speed on Idling Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks SAE 2003-01-0290
- Lim Han Study of Exhaust Emissions from Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks and Commercially Available Idle Reducing Devices SAE 2003-01-0288
- Kittelson D. B. Abdul-Khalek I. S. Graskow B. R. Brear F. Wei Q. “Diesel Exhaust Particle Size: Measurement Issues and Trends,” SAE 980525 Society of Automotive Engineers Warren, MI 1998
- Cheng M. D. Storey J. M. et al. “Impacts of venturi turbulent mixing on the size distributions of sodium chloride and dioctyl-phthalate aerosols,” Journal of Aerosol Science 33 3 491 502 2002
- Hess Howard Boehman A. L. Anderson R. C. “Optimization and Comparison of Two Methods for Determination of Diesel Particulate Emissions.” SAE 2000-02-2956 Society of Automotive Engineers Warren, MI 2000
- Swarin Stephen J. Loo Jeffrey F. Chladek Ema Drouillard Monica S. Tejada Silvestre B. “Advanced emissions speciation methodologies for the auto/oil air quality improvement research program-II aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols,” SAE 920321 Society of Automotives Engineers Warren., MI 1992
- Greer Rex www.ponypack.com