This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Considerations in Material, Part, and Process Design for Downgauged RRIM Applications
Technical Paper
2003-01-0209
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
To address the automotive industry's initiative to maximize the utility of each component by decreasing both weight and cost to improve the performance and value of its products, it is logical to try to minimize the thickness of any part whose main function is ostensibly decorative. A example of such a candidate part on the vehicle would be the fascia and body side claddings. The fascia and claddings of vehicles do provide some impact resistance and resiliency functionality to vehicles, but more and more, the energy management functionality is being taken on by improvements in the engineering design and support systems behind the exterior part. The function of these exterior parts then, is, to a large degree, to be aesthetically pleasing when painted, and maintain their high quality fit and finish over the life of the vehicle. These applications are therefore justifiably subject to investigations into the reduction of their wallstock.
Downgauging, or reducing the thickness of any part, regardless of the material is being used in a particular application, is not necessarily a trivial matter. Under the wise axiom that one “never gets something for nothing”, some part design, material architecture, assembly system, and mould processing considerations must be investigated. This same type of critical engineering thought holds when designing and manufacturing parts using the RRIM process. Part thickness is an integral part of the design criteria for any part, and it has a dramatic effect on several key parameters in the RRIM process and part manufacture. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and explore some of these parameters, and to outline the engineering considerations that must be made in the design and execution of a successful thinwall RRIM program.
Topic
Citation
Goldhawk, M. and Wesolowski, M., "Considerations in Material, Part, and Process Design for Downgauged RRIM Applications," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0209, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0209.Also In
References
- Vitkuske, J. Elder, K. Peterson, D. Zerafa, G. Mecozzi, R. Smith, D. Coke, B. “Advancements in RRIM Fascia Applications Provide Cost Competitiveness While Meeting Performance Requirements” SAE Congress Paper No. 970482 Detroit 1997
- Allen, M. Beazley, A. Hutchinson, D. Conix Canada 1996 “Process for the Production of Lightweight Polyurethane Mouldings”
- Sinopoli, D. “Density Reduction in Automotive Polyurethane RRIM Fascias” Polyurethanes World Congress Proceedings Amsterdam 1997
- Goldhawk, M. Nichols-Fauth, E. Trieu, K. “Emerging Technologies in RIM Fascia - A Focus on Lightweighting and Downgauging” SAE Congress Paper No. 980104 Detroit 1998
- Berg, J. “Lightweight Reaction Injection Moulded Polyurethanes for Automotive Fascia” SAE Congress Paper No. 950552 Detroit 1995
- James, A. Dowen, J. Rodriguez, M. “Field Evaluation of Down-Gauged High Performance RIM Fascia Polymers” SAE Congress Paper 930539 Detroit 1993
- Schrott, B. Bennett, K. “Downgauging with High Performance Filled RIM Polymers - Lowering Fascia Cost and Improving Quality” SAE Congress Paper No. 920528 Detroit 1992
- Meiners, H. Boden, H. “Development of RRIM PUs for Thin-Walled Car Parts” Reinforced Plastics April 1993 46 50
- Perry, R. Green, D. “Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook” 6th McGraw-Hill 1984
- Macosko, C. Fundamentals of Reaction Injection Moulding Hanser Publishers New York 1989
- Dow Automotive SPECTRIM™ Body Panel Design Guide 1999