This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Energy Transfer to an Occupant in Rear Crashes: Effect of Stiff and Yielding Seats
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
For several decades, there has been a debate on the safety merits of yielding and rigidized (stiff) seats. In 1995, GM adopted requirements for high retention seats and introduced a new generation of yielding seatbacks. These seats have the same stiffness as the yielding seats of the 1980s and early 1990s, but have a strong frame structure and recliners to substantially limit seatback rotation in severe rear crashes. The yielding behavior is given by compliance of the seat suspension across the side structures and an open perimeter frame, which allows the occupant to penetrate into the seatback.
The purpose of this study is to compare the energy transfer characteristics and occupant dynamics of yielding and stiff seats in 35 km/h and 16 km/h rear crashes. Based on benchmarking tests, the stiff seatback is defined as one having a 40 kN/m stiffness in rearward loading by a Hybrid dummy. The yielding seatback has a 20 kN/m stiffness, which is comparable to the 1997 W car seat, the first high retention seat introduced by GM. For this study, the vehicle acceleration was a constant 10 g or 4.5 g over 100 ms giving the delta V of 35 km/h or 16 km/h. An Excel spreadsheet analysis was conducted to determine occupant dynamics in a step-forward solution based on the differential displacement between the occupant and vehicle. Force and acceleration of the occupant are proportional to seatback stiffness and the differential displacement.
The yielding seatback developed 15%-16% lower forces on the occupant and acceleration with a delayed loading as compared to the stiff seat. The time delay improved the efficiency of the energy transfer and allowed force to be applied on the occupant after the head, neck and torso received uniform support by the seatback and head restraint. Even with an initial 15 cm gap behind the occupant or a higher initial vehicle acceleration pulse, the yielding seatback provided a more gradual acceleration and lower loads on the occupant with 68% greater occupant displacement with respect to the vehicle.
This study shows the benefits of a yielding seatback over a stiff seat on occupant dynamics in rear crashes. The more gradual ride-up of the crash delta V allows a later occupant loading during the time the head, neck and back have more uniform support from the seat and head restraint. In contrast, the stiff seat has a load of 4 kN when the relative penetration of the occupant is 10 cm, which is before the likely time of head restraint contact. The comparable load with the yielding seatback is only 2 kN indicating much lower forces on the back and base of the neck.
CitationViano, D., "Energy Transfer to an Occupant in Rear Crashes: Effect of Stiff and Yielding Seats," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0180, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0180.
Advances in Vehicle Aggresivity & Compatibility, Side & Rear Impact, & Rollover Protection
Number: SP-1775; Published: 2003-03-03
Number: SP-1775; Published: 2003-03-03
- Benson BR Smith GC Kent RW Monson CR Effect of seat stiffness in out-of-position occupant response in rear-end collisions SAE 962434 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA 1996
- Blaisdell DM Levitt AE Varat MS Automotive seat design concepts for occupant protection SAE 930340 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA 1993
- Cantor A Petition for Rulemaking to Amend FMVSS 207 to Prohibit Ramping Up the Seat Back of an Occupant During a Collision National Highway Traffic Safety Administration December 28 1989
- Digges KH Morris JH Malliaris AC Safety performance of motor vehicle seats SAE 930348 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA 1993
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards No. 202, 207, and 301 49 Code of Federal Regulations Section 571.21 1968.
- Prasad P Kim A Weerappuli DPV Robert V Schneider D Relationship Between Passenger Car Seat Back Strength and Occupant Injury Severity in Rear End Collisions: Field and Laboratory Studies SAE 973343 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA. 1997
- Rake B Boehm S Auto Seat Systems: Dangerous Safety Restraints? Trial April Issue 80 87 1990
- Saczalski KJ Petition to Improve FMVSS 207 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration April 18 1989
- Saczalski KJ Syson SR Hille RA Pozzi MC Field accident evaluations and experimental study of seat back performance relative to rear-impact occupant protection SAE 930346 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA 1993
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Backrest and Head Restraint Design for Rear-end Collision Protection SAE 680079 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1968a
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Preliminary findings of head support designs 11th Stapp Car Crash Conf SAE 670921 SAE Warrendale PA 337 405 1967
- Severy DM Brink HM Baird JD Vehicle Design for Passenger Protection from High Speed Rear End Collisions SAE 680774 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1968b
- Severy DM Harrison MB Baird JD Collision Performance, LM Safety Car SAE 670458 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA. 1967
- Severy DM Mathewson JH Bechtol CO Controlled Automotive Rear-End Collisions, An Investigation of Related Engineering and Medical Phenomena Canadian Services Medical Journal VII 727 759 1955
- Stephens GD Long TJ Blaisdell DM Energy Analysis of Automotive Seat Systems SAE 2000-01-1380 SP-1494 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2000
- Strother CE James MB Evaluation of Seat Back Strength and Seat Belt Effectiveness in Rear End Impacts 31st Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE 872214 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 225 244 1987
- Strother CE James MB Gordon JJ Response of out-of-position dummies in rear impact SAE 941055 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA 1994
- USPTO Vehicle Seat with Perimeter Frame and Pelvic Catcher US Patent 5,509,716 April 23 1996
- Viano DC Cause and Control of Automotive Trauma Bulletin NY Academy of Medicine Second 64 5 376 421 June 1988
- Viano D Olsen S The Effectiveness of Active Head Restraint in Preventing Whiplash J Trauma 51 959 969 November 2001
- Viano DC Role of the Seat in Rear Crash Safety 0-7680-0847-6 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA SAE R-317 1 491 2002
- Viano DC Olsen S Locke GS Humer M Neck Biomechanical Responses with Active Head Restraint Systems: Rear Barrier Tests with BioRID and Sled Tests with Hybrid III SAE 2002-01-0030 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2002
- Viano DC High-Retention Seat Performance in Quasistatic Seat Tests SAE 2003-01-0173 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Warner C Strother C James MB Decker RL Occupant Protection in Rear-End Collisions II: The Role of Seat Back Deformation in Injury Reduction 35th Stapp Car Crash Conf SAE 912914 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA. 1991