This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reformulating Gasoline for Lower Emissions Using the Fuel Additive MMT®
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 21, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Throughout the world, governments are promulgating regulations that are intended to improve air quality. Some of these regulations affect the physical and chemical properties of gasoline. Consequently, refiners are under increasing pressure to reformulate their gasoline to be lower emitting when handled and combusted. These regulatory actions have also greatly reduced flexibility in the fuel formulation process. In many cases, refiners are attempting to reduce gasoline vapor pressure, sulfur, aromatic, and olefin content while simultaneously tightening distillation characteristics by removing butane and reducing the use of heavy reformate and FCC fractions. Because butane, aromatics and olefins can contribute substantially to pool octane levels, blending clean-burning gasoline with the required octane rating for acceptable vehicle performance can be difficult. Use of the “fuel additive methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl” (MMT®) not only helps maintain vehicle emission system activity, but effectively increases gasoline octane rating, thus enabling refiners to increase the volume of clean-burning low octane streams blended directly into the gasoline pool.
Several different aspects of the impact of fuel reformulation on emission system durability will be discussed in this paper. First, the long-term impact of fuel formulation on vehicle emission system performance is studied. The effect of blending fuels with and without the additive MMT® to meet various fuel standards is then explored and the effect of this formulation strategy on vehicle emissions is evaluated. In particular, the emissions benefit conveyed by specifically obtaining the last increment of octane with MMT® instead of other conventional measures is examined. Using MMT® in this manner allows heavy aromatic blend streams to be replaced with lighter, more paraffinic components, which lowers aromatic levels and distillation temperatures. Therefore, gasoline blended with MMT® via this approach is inherently cleaner-burning than gasoline blended without the additive.
CitationRoos, J., Grande, D., Hollrah, D., and Cunningham, L., "Reformulating Gasoline for Lower Emissions Using the Fuel Additive MMT®," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2893, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2893.
- Hollrah, D.P. and Burns, A.M. Oil & Gas J, 89(10), 85-90, 1991
- Aradi, A.A., Roos, J.W., Fort, B.F., Lee, T.E., and Davidson, R.I. “The Physical and Chemical Effect of Manganese Oxides on Automobile Catalytic Converters”, SAE Paper 940747, 1994.
- Roos, J.W., Lenane, D.L., Dykes, K.L. and Scull, H.M., “A Systems Approach to Improved Exhaust Catalyst Durability: The Role of the MMT® Fuel Additive”, SAE Paper 2000-01-1880, 2000.
- Roos, J.W., Lenane, D.L., Fort, B.F., Grande, D.G., and Dykes, K.L., “The Effect of Manganese Oxides on OBD-II Catalytic Converter Monitoring”, SAE Paper 942056, 1994.
- Roos, J.W., Scull, H.M., Dykes, K.L., Hotchkiss, A.R., Grande, D.G. and Lenane, D.L., “Evaluation of On-Board Diagnostic Systems and the Impact of Gasoline Containing MMT®” SAE Paper 972849, 1997.
- “Automotive Electric/Electronic Systems” Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, 1988.
- Kalghatgi, G.T., “Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part II. Vehicle Studies - How Relevant is Motor Octane Number (MON) in Modern Engines?” SAE Paper 2001-01-3583.
- Wang, T., Soltis, R.E., Logothetis, E.M., Cook, J.A. and Hamburg, D.R. “Static Characteristics of ZrO2 Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensors” SAE Paper 930352.
- “MMT Test Procedure Protocol” MVMA Comments, Air Docket A-92-41, November 9, 1992.
- Darr, S.T., Choski, R.A., Hubbard, C.P., Johnson, M.D., McCabe, R.W., “Effects of Oil-Derived Contaminants on Emissions from TWC-Equipped Vehicles,” SAE paper 2000-01-1881, 2000.
- Williamson, W.B., Gandhi, H.S., and Weaver, E.E. “Effects of Fuel Additive MMT on Contaminant Retention and Catalyst Performance”, SAE Paper 821193, 1982.
- Ball D.J., Mohammed, A.G., and Schmidt, W.A., “Application of Accelerated Rapid Aging Test (RAT) Schedules with Poisons: The Effects of Oil Derived Poisons, Thermal Degradation and Catalyst Volume on FTP Emissions”, SAE Paper 972846, 1997.
- Colmenares, C., Deutsch, S., Evans, C. Nelson, A.J, Terminello, L.J., Reynolds, J.G., Roos, J.W. and Smith I.L. “Analysis of Manganese Particulates from Automotive Decomposition of Methylcyclopentadienyl Manganese Tricarbonyl.” Appl. Surface Sci., 151, 189-202, 1999.
- Ressler, T. Wong, J., Roos, J., and Smith I.L. “Quantitative Speciation of Mn-bearing Particulates Emitted from Autos Burning Methylcyclopentadienyl Manganese Tricarbonyl-(MMT-)added Gasolines using XANES Spectroscopy” Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 950-958, 2000.
- Meffert, M.W., Lenane, D.L., Openshaw, M. and Roos, J.W., “Analysis of Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Light Duty Passenger Cars” SAE paper 2000-01-1952, 2000.
- Baronick, J, Heller, B. Lach, G., and Ramacher, B., “Impact of Sulfur in Gasoline on Nitrous Oxide and Other Exhaust Gas Components” SAE Paper 2000-01-0857, 2000.
- Goodfellow, C.L., Gorse, R.A., Hawkins, M.J., McArragher, J.S., “European Programme on Emission, Fuels, and Engine Technologies (EPEFE) -Gasoline Aromatics/E100 Study” SAE Paper 961072, 1996.
- Koehl, W.J., Benson, J.D., Burns, V.R., Gorse, R.A., Hochhauser, A.M., Knepper, J.C., Leppard, W.R., Painter, L.J., Rapp, L.A., Reuter, R.M., Rutherford, J.A. “Effects of Heavy Hydrocarbon in Gasoline on Exhaust Mass Emissions, Air Toxics, and Calculated Reactivity - Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program.” SAE Paper 932723, 1993.
- Thummadetsak, T., Wuttimongkolchai, A. , Tunyapisetsak, S., and Kimura, T. “Effect of Gasoline Compositions and Properties on Tailpipe Emission of Currently Existing Vehicles in Thailand.” SAE Paper 1999-01-3570, 1999.