This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Soot Oxidation by NO2 Only and Plasma-Treated Gas Containing NO2, O2, and Hydrocarbons
Technical Paper
2002-01-2704
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
NO2 is an effective soot oxidizer operating at lower temperatures than O2. The effect of pure NO2 on soot oxidation was evaluated and compared with the gas treated by plasma, which initially consisted of NO, O2, and hydrocarbons. The cutout of a commercial DPF was used and the pressure difference across the DPF was monitored for an hour. The concentration of NO/NO2, CO, CO2 at the outlet of the DPF was measured as a function of time. CO and CO2 concentration was measured periodically by gas chromatography. The experiment was performed at 230, 250, 300, 350°C.
When NO2 only was used as an oxidizing agent, there was a close relationship between the decrease of the pressure difference across the DPF, the CO and CO2 concentration at the outlet of the DPF, and the back conversion of NO2 to NO. The CO and CO2 concentration was not detectable under 250°C; the pressure differences and the change of NO and NO2 concentration across the DPF showed the NO2-carbon reaction occurred only slightly at 250°C. The oxidation rate increased as the temperature went up at the given conditions. NO2 gas was reduced to NO while oxidizing soot and the soot was oxidized to CO and CO2 simultaneously.
In the case of the plasma-treated gas, the soot oxidation rate was much higher than that for pure NO2 at the same temperatures. A decrease in the pressure difference across the DPF was observed under 250°C and more NO2 was detected in the outlet of the DPF than for the NO2 only case showing the higher decrease rate of the pressure difference across the DPF.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Kim, D., Lee, H., Chun, K., Hwang, J. et al., "Comparison of Soot Oxidation by NO2 Only and Plasma-Treated Gas Containing NO2, O2, and Hydrocarbons," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2704, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2704.Also In
References
- Allasson R. Blakeman P. G. Cooper B. J. Hess H. Silcock P. J. Walker A. P. “Optimizing the Low Temperature Performance and Regeneration Efficiency of the Continuously Regenerating Diesel Particulate Filter (CR-DPF) System” SAE 2002-01-0428
- Chun B. H. Lee H. S. Nam C. S. Chun K. M. Ryu J. H. Lee K. Y. “Plasma/Catalyst System for Reduction of NOx in Diesel Engine Exhaust” SAE 2000-01-2897
- Aardhl C. L. Habeger C. F. Balmer M. L. Rappe K. G. Tran D. N. Avila M. Park P. W. Koshkarian K. A. Chanda A. “Plasma-Enhanced Catalytic Reduction of NOx in Simulated Lean Exhaust” SAE 2000-01-2961
- Hoard J. W. Panov A. “Products and Intermediates in Plasma-Catalyst Treatment of Simulated Diesel Exhaust” SAE 2001-01-3512
- Panov A. G. Tonkyn R. G. Balmer M. L. Peden C. H. F. Malkin A. Hoard J. W. “Selective Reduction of NOx in Oxygen Rich Environments with Plasma-Assisted Catalysis: The Role of Plasma and Reactive Intermediates” SAE 2001-01-3513
- Dorai R. Kushner M. J. “Effect of Propene on the Remediation of NOx from Engine Exhausts” SAE 1999-01-3683
- Marinov N. M. “An Experimental and Kinetic Calculation of the Promotion Effect of Hydrocarbons on the NO-NO 2 Conversion in a Flow Reactor” 27th Int. Symp. On Combustion Sept. 1998