This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessing the Economic Viability of Advanced Vehicle Technologies
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published July 09, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: International Body Engineering Conference & Exhibition and Automotive & Transportation Technology Congress
All over the world, there are currently many advanced vehicle technology development efforts underway to improve fuel economy or exploit alternative fuel sources. These efforts range from reduced mass body structures to advanced powertrain architectures. In additional to the technical and performance hurdles, these efforts also face economic obstacles if they are ever to compete with and replace conventional vehicle concepts.
As far as the manufacturing economics for many advanced technologies are understood at all, most are likely to be more expensive than conventional vehicles in the near term. In order to intelligently invest in new technology development, the entire life cycle economic costs and benefits must be assessed so that the eventual return on investment, if one even exists, can be known.
This paper addresses a methodology for comparing both the up front manufacturing costs and the operation life cycle costs for conventional and advanced vehicle technologies.
CitationMascarin, A., "Assessing the Economic Viability of Advanced Vehicle Technologies," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2247, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2247.
- Mascarin Anthony E. Johnson Krista “Assessing the Impact of Alternative Body Technologies” International Body Engineering Conference July 2002
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. “Challenging Today's Stamped Steel Unibody: Assessing Prospects For Steel, Aluminum, And Polymer Composites” International Body Engineering Conference October 1997
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. “The Manufacturing Economics of the Ultra Light Steel Auto Body (ULSAB): Implications for a Technology Strategy,” International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA), ISATA Florence, Italy June 1996
- Dieffenbach Jeff R. Mascarin Anthony E. “Body-in-White Material Systems: A Lifecycle Cost Comparison,” Journal of Metals, Journal of Metals Warrendale PA 45 6 16 19 June 1993
- IBIS previous studies and experience - data, relationships and process cost models from previous IBIS experience were used to establish cost relationships for body structures other components in this analysis
- The Hypercar Center “Vehicle Design Strategies to Meet and Exceed PNGV Goals” Future Transportation Technology Conference” SAE 951906
- Busch John V. Technical Cost Modeling of Plastics Fabrication Processes Ph.D. Thesis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 1987