This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Alternative Roof Crush Resistance Testing with Production and Reinforced Roof Structures
Technical Paper
2002-01-2076
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The government, automotive industry and scientific community are currently scrutinizing the adequacy of the FMVSS #216 roof crush standard in the United States. As a result of concern about the ability of FMVSS #216 to enforce reasonable protection to occupants in rollovers, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has recently published a Request For Comments in the Federal Register regarding updating this standard1. The inverted drop test methodology is a promising alternative test procedure to evaluate the structural integrity of roofs and is being considered by NHTSA as a possible compliance test. Recent testing on many different vehicle types indicates that damage consistent with field rollover accidents can be achieved through inverted drop testing at very small drop heights. Drop tests matrices were performed on 9 pairs of vehicles representing the majority of personal transportation vehicle types. This paper offers several examples of post-production reinforcements to roof structures that significantly increase the crush resistance of the roof as measured by inverted drop tests. These modifications were implemented with minimal impact on vehicle styling, interior space and visual clearances. The results of these modifications indicate that roof intrusion protection can be enhanced by nearly an order of magnitude as roof crush was reduced by 44-89% with only a 1–2.3% increase in vehicle weight.
Research and testing indicates that the static vehicle roof crush resistance, as measured by the current FMVSS 216 test procedure, is highly dependent on glazing integrity and the angle of load application. Fractured or missing glazing and/or more lateral load applications, as typically seen in field accidents, significantly reduce the structural resistance capabilities of many automotive roof structures. Two tests are presented in which the vehicle roofs are shown to collapse significantly under their own weight when the glazing is removed and the vehicles are placed on the roofs at lateral angles beyond those described in FMVSS 216 or SAE J996.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | The Relationship Between Vertical Velocity and Roof Crush in Rollover Crashes |
Technical Paper | An Evaluation of Laminated Side Window Glass Performance During Rollover |
Technical Paper | Strength Improvements to Automotive Roof Components |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Herbst, B., Forrest, S., Meyer, S., and Hock, D., "Alternative Roof Crush Resistance Testing with Production and Reinforced Roof Structures," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2076, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2076.Also In
References
- 2001
- Chng D. Herbst B. Meyer S. Forrest S. Davis M. “An Analytical Method for Calculating Roof Stiffness Factors from Roof Performance During Dynamic and Quasistatic Loading Tests,” Paper No. 00SAF007, ISATA 2000 Dublin, Ireland September 25-27 2000
- Herbst B. Meyer S. Forrest S. “An Analytical Method of Calculating Dynamic Roof Strength Chareacteristics and Equivalent Drop Height” The Fourth International Conference on Accident Inverstigation, Reconstruction, Interpretation and the Law (AIRIL) Vancouver, British Columbia 2001
- Stone K. “Occupant Protection During Vehicle Rollover” 5th ESV Conference 1974
- Herbst B. Forrest S. Meyer S.E. 1998 “Strength Improvements to Automotive Roof Components,” SAE 980209
- Forrest S. Meyer S. Herbst B. “The Relationship of Roof Crush and Head Clearance on Neck Injuries in Rollovers,” 10th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering Singapore December 2000
- Murakami Tatsuro United States Patent 4,355,843 Oct. 26 1982
- Herbst B. Forrest S. Meyer S.E. 1998 “Strength Improvements to Automotive Roof Components,” SAE 980209
- Sironic E. Grzebieta R. “Should Car Roof Pillars be Epoxy –Filled for Increased Roll-over Strength?” 15th ESV Conference
- Lilley K. Mani A. 1996 “Roof-Crush Strength Improvement Using Rigid Polyurethane Foam,” SAE 960435
- Forrest S. Meyer S. Herbst B. “The Relationship of Roof Crush and Head Clearance on Neck Injuries in Rollovers,” 10th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering Singapore December 2000
- Grzebieta R. Kilner A. Murray N. “Gross Bending Deformation of Hollow And Void Filled Square Tubes” Structural Stability and Design 397 403 Rotterdam 1995
- Tyan T. Shyu S. Mani A. “Rollover Roof Crush Studies” Contract No. DTNH22-92-07323 1993
- Lampinen B.E. Jeryan R.A. “Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam in Energy Absorbing Structures” SAE 820494 , SAE International Congress and Exposition 1982
- Alwan J. Wu C. Chou C. “Effect of Polyurethane Foam on the Energy Management of Structural Components” SAE 2000-01-0052
- Alwan J. Wu C. Chou C. “Effect of Epoxy-Based Structural Foam on Energy Management: An Experimental and Analytical Investigation” SAE 2001-01-0473
- Herbst B. Chng D. Meyer S. Forrest S. “Reinforcing Automotive Roofs with Composite Materials” Paper No. 00SAF008, ISATA 2000 Dublin, Ireland September 25-27 2000
- Herbst B. Forrest S. Meyer S. Hock D. “Improving Rollover Crashworthiness Through Inverted Drop Testing” SAE 2001-01-3213 , Automotive and Transportation Technology Congress and Exhibition 2001
- Herbst B. Forrest S. Meyer S. Chng D. Davis M. “Vehicle Crashworthiness in Vertical Drop Tests,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition Orlando, Florida November 2000
- April 5 1971