This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Prediction of Springback and Final Shape in Stamped Automotive Assemblies: Comparison of Finite Element Predictions and Experiments
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published July 09, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: International Body Engineering Conference & Exhibition and Automotive & Transportation Technology Congress
This work presents a numerical method for predicting the final shape of stamped automotive assemblies. Each assembly was manufactured by laser trimming and spot–welding two separate stampings together. The panels that represented the ‘inner’ of the automotive assembly were stamped from 1.04mm or 1.63mm AA5754 sheet, while panels representing the ‘outer’ were stamped from 0.93mm AA6111 sheet.
The finite element method (FEM) was used to predict the final shape of the automotive assemblies. For these predictions, finite element models of the forming, individual panel springback, and final assembly springback operations were performed. The laser trimming and spot–welding processes were modelled using pre–processing software.
Experimental validation of the finite element models was undertaken using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) as well as a non–contact surface digitizing technique. Comparison of the finite element model predictions with the experiments has shown that the influence of the assembly operations such as trimming and spot–welding on final assembly shape can be predicted. These comparisons have also demonstrated the sensitivity of the results to experimental variation.
CitationThomas, D., Galbraith, C., Bull, M., and Finn, M., "Prediction of Springback and Final Shape in Stamped Automotive Assemblies: Comparison of Finite Element Predictions and Experiments," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2063, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2063.
- Hammett Patrick C., Majeske Karl D., Baron Jay S.. Functional build: Integrating automotive body–design & process–development. In Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pages 1–19. IEEE, 1998
- Surface scanning was provided by Applied Precision Inc. 7895 Tranmere Drive, Unit 2, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5S 1V9.
- DYNAFORM User's Manual. Engineering Technology Associates, Inc. 1133 E. Maple Road, Suite 200 Troy MI 48083, USA. 2001.
- LS–DYNA Keyword User's Manual Version 960, Volumes 1 & 2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2001.
- Barlat Fred and Lian J.. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part 1: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. International Journal of Plasticity, 5:51–66, 1989.
- 16. Simo J. C. and Armero F.. Geometrically non–linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 33:1413–1449, 1992.
- WangM.N., Predicting the effect of the die gap on flange springback, in: Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Congress IDDRG, Melbourne, 1984.