This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
An Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Assessing Driver Workload in the Early Development of In-Vehicle Information Systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 13, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study examined whether the effect of subsidiary tasks on driving performance can be predicted from stationary (static) testing. Alternative methods for assessing the performance of drivers during their use of in-vehicle information systems were examined. These methods included static testing in stationary vehicles, as well as dynamic, on-road testing. The measures that were obtained from static tests were evaluated in terms of how well they could predict measures obtained from driving performance during on-road testing (which included concurrent use of secondary information systems). The results indicated that measures obtained in static test settings were highly correlated with corresponding measures obtained from on-road performance testing. Also, the regression slopes and intercepts of on-road driving performance measures when predicting on-road lane deviations were more closely approximated under static conditions which required drivers to attend to concurrent, driving-like activities as well as secondary tasks. It is suggested that tests using multiple measures, together with a multivariate model, may hold the most promise for predicting eventual on-road driver performance in the early development of in-vehicle information systems. Although additional research and theoretical development are required, this research demonstrates that a set of relatively simple measures obtained analytically and from static testing can be used even now to help guide early system development.
CitationAngell, L., Young, R., Hankey, J., and Dingus, T., "An Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Assessing Driver Workload in the Early Development of In-Vehicle Information Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1981, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1981.
SAE 2002 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Electronic and Electrical Systems
Number: V111-7 ; Published: 2003-09-15
Number: V111-7 ; Published: 2003-09-15
- Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group (2002). Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 2.0. Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers.
- Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (2000). Proposed Driver Workload Metrics and Methods Project. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm).
- Farber, E., Blanco, M., Foley, J.P., Curry, R., Greenberg, J.A., and Serafin, C.P. (2000). Surrogate measures of visual demand while driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Vol. 3, 274-277. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
- Hankey, J. M., Dingus, T. A., Hanowski, R. J., and Wierwille, W. W. (2000). The development of a design evaluation tool and model of attention demand. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm).
- Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Hancock P. A. and Meshkati N. (Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
- Hashimoto, K., and Atsumi, B. (2001). Study of occlusion technique for making the static evaluation method for visual distraction. Japanese Report on Occlusion Workshop. Turin, Italy. November 15, 2001.
- Martens, M. H., and van Winsum, W. (2000). Measuring distraction: The peripheral detection task. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm).
- Olsson, S. and Burns, P. C. Measuring driver visual distraction with a peripheral detection task. Paper posted on the NHTSA website (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/Welcome.htm).
- SAE Recommended Practice J2396 (2000). Definitions and Experimental Measures Related to the Specification of Driver Visual Behavior Using Video Based Techniques.
- SAE (2000). Recommended Practice J2364 (Proposed). Navigation and Route Guidance Function Accessibility while Driving.
- Tijerina, L., Parmer, E., & Goodman, M. J. (2000). Preliminary evaluation of the proposed J2364 15-second rule for accessibility of route navigation system functions while driving. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (CD-ROM).
- VanWinsum, W., Martens, M. and Herland, L. (1999). The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance. TNO Report, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
- Wierwille, W. W. (2000) Initial development of a computer program for assessment and evaluation of in-vehicle task visual and manual demands. In Gale A. G. (Ed.) vision in Vehicles VIII, North Holland/Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. (In press.) Also, paper presented at the Eight International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, Boston, MA, August, 1999.
- Young, R. (2001) Communication Interface, Vision and the Older Driver. In The Eye and the Auto 2001 Conference, June 2001, http://www.brophy.com/DIO_web/eata/eata2001.htm>