This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Oxidation Catalytic Converter and Emulsified Fuel Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 04, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A study was conducted to assess the effects of a water-diesel fuel emulsion with and without an oxidation catalytic converter (OCC) on steady-state heavy-duty diesel engine emissions. Two OCCs with different metal loading levels were used in this study. A 1988 Cummins L10-300 heavy-duty diesel engine was operated at the rated speed of 1900 rpm and at 75% and 25% load conditions (EPA modes 9 and 11 respectively) of the 13 mode steady-state test as well as at idle. Raw exhaust emissions' measurements included total hydrocarbons (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and nitric oxide (NO). Diluted exhaust measurements included total particulate matter (TPM) and its primary constituents, the soluble organic (SOF), sulfate (SO42-) and the carbonaceous solids (SOL) fractions. Vapor phase organic compounds (XOC) were also analyzed. The SOF and XOC samples were analyzed for selected polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
The effect of the emulsified fuel without the OCC in the exhaust system was studied first. The emulsion reduced NOx by 16% and 6% at Modes 11 and 9 respectively. The reduction in TPM was 26% at Mode 11 and 45% at Mode 9. Solids reduced by 61% at Mode 11 and 66% at Mode 9. Total hydrocarbons increased by 33% at Mode 11 along with carbonyl emissions (aldehydes and ketones, by 76%), SOF (by 38%) and XOC (by 56%) using the emulsified fuel. BSFC reduced at all modes with the emulsion after correction for water in the emulsified fuel. An OCC was used in the exhaust system to reduce the HC and its associated emissions (aldehydes and ketones, SOF, XOC) along with TPM emissions. The HC emissions were reduced by 69% with OCC 1 and by 75% with OCC2 at Mode 11 with the emulsion. The SOF and XOC were reduced by 69% and 85% with OCC1 and by 81% and 89% with OCC 2 using the emulsion at Mode 11. Carbonyl emissions were reduced with both OCCs at Modes 11 and 9 using the emulsion.
- Girish Janakiraman - Michigan Technological University
- John H. Johnson - Michigan Technological University
- Susan T. Bagley - Michigan Technological University
- James R. Warner - Michigan Technological University
- Cuong T. Huynh - Michigan Technological University
- Amjad Khan - Michigan Technological University
- David G. Leddy - Michigan Technological University
CitationJanakiraman, G., Johnson, J., Bagley, S., Warner, J. et al., "Oxidation Catalytic Converter and Emulsified Fuel Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1277, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-1277.
- Bagley S.T. Baumgard K.J. Gratz L.D. Johnson J.H. Leddy D.G. 1996 “Characterization of Fuel and Aftertreatment Device Effects on Diesel Emissions.” Research Report No. 76 Health Effects Institute
- Brown K.F Chadderton J. Daly D.T. Langer D.A. Duncan D. 2000 “Opportunity for Diesel Emission Reductions Using Advanced Catalysts and Water Blend Fuel.” SAE 2000-01-0182
- Yoshida K. Makino S. Sumiya S. Muramatsu G. Helferich R. 1989 “Simultaneous Reduction of NO x and Particulate Emissions.” SAE 892046
- Wirbeleit F. Enderle Ch Lehner W. Raab A. Binder K. 1997 “Stratified Diesel Fuel-Water-Diesel Fuel Injection Combined with EGR-The Most Efficient In-Cylinder NO x and PM Reduction Technology.” SAE 972962
- Zelenka P. Ostgathe K. Lox E. 1990 “Reduction in Diesel Exhaust Emissions by using Oxidation Catalysts.” SAE 902111
- Andrews G. E. Iheozor-Ejiofor I.E. Pang S.W. “Diesel Particulate SOF Emissions Reduction using an Exhaust Catalyst.” SAE 870251
- Warner J.R. Huynh C.T. Janakiraman G. Johnson J.H. Bagley S.T. 2001 “Oxidation Catalytic Converter and Emulsified Fuel Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Particulate Matter Emissions.” SAE 2002-01-1278
- Baumgard K.J. 1995 “The Effect of Fuel Sulfur and Engine Design on Diesel Exhaust Particle Size Distributions.” Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI
- Lipari F. Swarin S.J. 1985 “2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine-coated Florisil Sampling Cartridges for the Determination of Formaldehyde in Air.” Environmental Science Technology 19 70 74
- Greaves C. Khan I.M. Onion G. 1973 “Effects of Water Introduction on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission.” Sixteenth Symposium on Combustion The Combustion Institute 325
- Dec J.E. 1997 “A Conceptual Model of DI Diesel Combustion based on Laser-Sheet Imaging.” SAE 970873
- Clerc J.C. 1982 “A Computer Model for Predicting Temperature, Solids Concentration, and Adsorbed Hydrocarbon Concentration for Dilute Diesel Particulate Emissions.” Michigan Technological University
- Marek L. F. Hahn D. A. 1984 “The Catalytic Oxidation of Organic Compounds in the Vapor Phase.” The Chemical Catalog Co., Inc. New York
- Zaera F. Tjandra S. Janssens Ton V. W. 1997 “Selectivity among Dehydrogenation Steps for Alkyl Groups on Metal Surfaces: Comparison between Nickel and Platinum.” Department of Chemistry, University of California Riverside, California
- Wagner T. Wyszynski M.L. 1996 “Aldehydes and Ketones in Engine Exhaust Emissions- A Review.” Proceedings from Institution for Mechanical Engineers 210 109 122
- Kreso A.M. 1997 “A Study of the Effects of EGR on Diesel Exhaust Emissions and Sulfur Species in the EGR Cooling System.” Michigan Technological University
- Henein N.A. 1975 “The Diesel as an Alternative Automobile Engine.” SAE 750931