This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Benefits of Applying Adaptive Headlighting to the Current U.S. and European Low-Beam Patterns
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 04, 2002 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This analytical study examined the potential benefits of applying two embodiments of adaptive lighting to the U.S. and European low-beam patterns: curve lighting that involves shifting the beam horizontally into the curve, and motorway lighting that involves shifting the beam vertically upward.
The curve lighting simulations paired 240-m radius left and right curves with a horizontal shift of 10°, and 80-m radius curves with a horizontal beam shift of 15°. The motorway lighting simulations involved upward aim shifts of 0.25° and 0.5°. For both curve and motorway lighting, changes in both seeing and glare illuminance were considered. Market-weighted model year 2000 U.S. and European beam patterns were used.
We conclude that curve lighting, as simulated here, would substantially improve seeing performance on curves for both types of beams. On right curves (but not on left curves) there would be an increase in disability glare for oncoming traffic. (Because there will not always be an opposing vehicle, disability effects will be somewhat less frequent than the visibility benefits, which will apply to every curve.) No major discomfort-glare problems would be expected. Although the shifted U.S. beams performed slightly better overall than the shifted European beams, the main difference in performance is between the shifted and nominally aimed beams.
Motorway lighting, as simulated here, would also substantially improve seeing performance, with the benefits already present at an upward shift of 0.25°. Because the increases in glare illuminance would be minor, and because motorways often incorporate median barriers or wide separations between lanes of opposing traffic, we do not expect substantial problems with increased glare. The European beams benefit more from this embodiment of motorway lighting than do the U.S. beams. (This is the case because under nominal aim the European beams provide less visibility illuminance and their vertical gradient is steeper.) Nevertheless, the nominally aimed U.S. beams tend to outperform the European beams shifted upward 0.25°.
|Technical Paper||Lens Material Development for Improved Halogen Headlamp Visibility|
|Technical Paper||The Smart Headlamp System with Variable Low-Beam Pattern|
|Technical Paper||AFS Halogen Headlamp System - Experimental Study and First Field Results|
CitationSivak, M., Flannagan, M., Schoettle, B., and Nakata, Y., "Benefits of Applying Adaptive Headlighting to the Current U.S. and European Low-Beam Patterns," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0524, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0524.
SAE 2002 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V111-6 ; Published: 2003-09-15
Number: V111-6 ; Published: 2003-09-15
- AFS (Advanced Frontlighting Systems). (1994). EUREKA Project 1403, Part 1 - Project Information. Amsterdam, Holland: EUREKA.
- AFS (Advanced Frontlighting Systems). (1996). EUREKA Project 1403, Phase 1 - Feasibility Study, Final Report. Amsterdam, Holland: EUREKA.
- Aoki, T., Kitamura, H., Miyagawa, K., & Kaneda, M. (1997). Development of Active Headlight System (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 990650). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Gotoh, S., & Aoki, T. (1996). Development of Active Headlight. The 15th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Melbourne.
- Jones, K.J., & Hicks, H.V. (1970). The Lucas Autosensa. Technical Aspects of Road Safety, 41, 4.1-4.13.
- Kobayashi, S., & Hayakawa, M. (1991). Beam controllable headlighting system (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 910829). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Land, M.F. & Lee, D.N. (1994). Where we look when we steer. Nature, 369, 742-744.
- Olson, P.L. & Sivak, M. (1983). Comparison of headlamp visibility distance and stopping distance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 1177-1178.
- Rumar, K. (1997). Adaptive illumination systems for motor vehicles: Towards a more intelligent headlighting system (Report No. UMTRI-97-7). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
- Schmidt-Clausen, H.J. & Bindels, J.T.H. (1974). Assessment of discomfort glare in motor vehicle lighting. Lighting Research & Technology, 6, 79-88.
- Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., & Flannagan, M.J. (2002). High-beam and low-beam headlighting patterns in the U.S. and Europe at the turn of the millennium (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 2002-01-0262). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Sivak, M., Flannagan, M.J., Budnik, E.A., Flannagan, C.C., & Kojima, S. (1996). The locations of headlamps and driver eye positions in vehicles sold in the U.S.A. Ergonomics, 40, 872-878.
- Sivak, M., Flannagan, M.J., & Miyokawa, T. (2001). A first look at visually aimable and harmonized low-beam headlamps. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 30, 26-33.
- Sivak, M., Flannagan, M.J., Schoettle, N., & Nakata, Y. (2001). Benefits of applying adaptive lighting to the U.S. and European low-beam patterns (Report No. UMTRI-2001-20). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
- Sivak, M., Flannagan, M.J., Traube, E.C., Aoki, M., & Sayer, J.R. (1994). Evaluation of an active headlight system (Report No. UMTRI-94-17). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
- Wada, K., Miyazawa, K., Yagi, S., Takahashi, K., & Shibata, H. (1989). Steerable forward lighting system (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 890682). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.