This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Injury and Response of the Shoulder in Lateral Sled Tests
Published November 01, 2001 by The Stapp Association in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: STAPP Car Crash Conference
The biomechanical response and injury tolerance of the shoulder in lateral impacts is not well understood. These data are needed to better understand human injury tolerance, validate finite element models and develop biofidelic shoulders in side impact dummies. Seventeen side impact sled tests were performed with unembalmed human cadavers. Data analyzed for this study include T1-Y acceleration, shoulder and thoracic load plate forces, upper sternum x and y accelerations, and struck side acromion x, y and z accelerations. One dimensional deflection at the shoulder level was determined from high-speed film by measuring the distance between a target on T1 and the impacted wall. Force-time response corridors were obtained for tests with 9 m/s pelvic offset, 10.5 m/s pelvic offset, 9 m/s unpadded flat wall, 6.7 m/s unpadded flat wall, 9 m/s soft padding and 9 m/s stiff padding. Maximum shoulder plate forces in unpadded 9 m/s tests (5.5 kN) were larger than in 6.7 m/s tests (3.3 kN). The peak force at the shoulder was larger than at the thorax plate in unpadded and soft padded tests. T1-Y accelerations were larger in unpadded 9 m/s flat wall tests and unpadded pelvic offset 10.5 m/s tests (peak values of 130 and 145 g’s) than in other test conditions. Deflections between T1 and the struck wall ranged from 88 to 154 mm in unpadded tests and 95 to 128 mm in stiff and soft padded tests. Eighteen AIS 2 level shoulder injuries occurred in 11 test subjects. These injuries included left acromion fracture in five subjects, left acromioclavicular separation in ten subjects and left clavicle fracture in three subjects. Average MAIS to the shoulder was 0.86 in seven subjects which impacted 4 to 6 inches (101.6 to 152.4 mm) of soft or stiff padding and 1.6 in ten subjects which impacted no padding or 3 inches (76.2 mm) of stiff padding. Previous findings from this test series were reported by Irwin et al. (1993) for seven tests and focused on detailed analysis of shoulder deflection (T5 to shoulder edge). The current study is expanded to 17 tests and includes force, acceleration response and analysis of shoulder deflection (T1 to shoulder edge). Padding of 4 to 6 inches (101.6 mm to 152.4 mm) reduced shoulder injury approximately one AIS level. A combination of ASA10 and deflection was the best shoulder injury predictor. Shoulder deflection of 106 mm predicts 50% probability of MAIS 2.
CitationKoh, S., Cavanaugh, J., and Zhu, J., "Injury and Response of the Shoulder in Lateral Sled Tests," SAE Technical Paper 2001-22-0005, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-22-0005.
- Baker SP. (1974) Injury Classification and the international Classification of Disease Codes. Accid Anal & Prev, 14:187–196.
- Bolte JH, Hines MH, McFadden JD, and Saul RA. (2000) Shoulder Response Characteristics and Injury Due to Lateral Glenohumeral Joint Impacts. Proc. 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-SC18, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Cavanaugh JM, Walilko T, Malhotra A, Zhu Y, King AI. (1990) Biomechanical response and Injury Tolerance of the Thorax in Twelve Sled Side Impacts. Proc. 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 902307, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Cavanaugh JM, Zhu Y, Huang Y and King AI. (1992) Performance and Mechanical Properties of Various Padding Materials used in Cadaveric Side Imp act Tests, SAE Paper No. 920354, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Cavanaugh JM, Zhu Y, Huang Y, and King AI. (1993) Injury and Response of the Thorax in Side Impact Cadaveric Tests. Proc. 37th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No.933127, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Cavanaugh JM, Walilko, Timothy Chung, Jaekoo and King. Albert I (1996) Abdominal Injury and Response in Side Impact, Proc. 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No. 962410, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- FMVSS 214, 49 CFR Part 571 (1990) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard NO. 214, Side Impact protection. Federal Register, Docket No. 88-06, Notice 8, Rin 2127-AB86, Vol. 55(210), Oct. 30, 1990.
- Instrumentation for Impact Test, SAE Recommended Practice Revised J211, March 1995.
- Irwin A, Cavanaugh JM. (1993) Displacement Responses of the Shoulder and Thorax in Lateral Sled Impact. Proc. 37th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No.933124, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Moore KL. (1980) Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
- Iwamoto M, Miki K, Mohammad M, Nayef A, Yang KH, Begeman PC, King AI. (2000) Development of a Finite Element Model of the Human Shoulder. Proc. 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-SC19, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Morgan RM, Marcus JH. (1986) Side Impact – The biofidelity of NHTSA’s Proposed ATD and Efficacy of TTI. Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No.861877, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Sacreste J, Cassan FB, Fayon A, and Tarriere C, Got C and Patel A (1982). Proposal for a Thorax Tolerance Level in Side Impacts Based on 62 Tests Performed with Cadavers Having Known Bone Condition, 26th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper No.821157, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.
- Zhu JY, Cavanaugh JM. (1993) Pelvic Biomechanical response and padding Benefits in Side Impact Base on a Cadaveric Test Series. Proc. 37th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper No. 933128, SAE, Warrendale, Pennsylvania.