A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE AND VEHICLE -TO-RIGID FIXED BARRIER FRONTAL IMPACTS
Published June 4, 2001 by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in United States
Annotation ability available
The relationship between designing for both rigid fixed barrier (RFB) and vehicle-to-vehicle tests is a topical area of research. Specifically, vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility has been a topic of keen interest to many researchers, and the interplay between the two aspects of design is presently addressed.
In this paper, the studied vehicles for potential vehicle-to-vehicle impacts included: sport utility vehicles (SUVs), Pickups (PUs), and passenger cars. The SUV/PU-to-Car frontal impact tests were compared to those obtained from vehicle-to-rigid fixed barrier frontal impacts. Acceleration pulses at the B-pillar/rocker as well as dash and cabin intrusions were monitored and compared. Additionally, the energy distributions in SUV/PU-to-Car crash tests were compared to those of single vehicle-to-RFB tests.
It was concluded from the analysis that vehicle weight and front-end stiffness were not always the overriding factors dictating performance. Design alternatives that have positive impact on the distribution of energy on both vehicles involved in a crash were shown to provide improvement in vehicle compatibility. In the present work, it was also shown that good geometrical interaction in SUV/PU-to-Car impact was fundamental in providing self and partner risk-reducing potential. Moreover, the effect of geometry was shown to possibly mask the effects of mass and stiffness.
CitationBarbat, S., Li, X., and Prasad, P., "A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE-TO-VEHICLE AND VEHICLE -TO-RIGID FIXED BARRIER FRONTAL IMPACTS," SAE Technical Paper 2001-06-0031, 2001.
- Zobel, R., “ Evaluation of the safety performance of passenger vehicles”, 11th ESV Conference, May 1987.
- Foret-Bruno, J. Y., Le Coz, J.Y., Thomas, C. Brutel, G., “In depth analysis of frontal collisions as regards the influence of overlaps and intrusion on occupant severe and fatal injuries”, 14th ESV Conference, Munich, May 1994.
- Hobbs, A. C., “The need for improved structural integrity in frontal car impacts”, 13th ESV Conference, Paper No. S9-0-12, November 1991.
- Ragland, C., “Offset test procedure development and comparison”, 16th ESV Conference, Paper No. 98-S-0-03, Windsor, Canada, May 1998.
- Mertz, H., “Anthropomorphic Test Devices”, in Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention, by Nahum A. and Melvin J., eds., Spring-Verlag, New York, 1993.