This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Modifying an Intake Manifold to Improve Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in a DI Diesel Engine Using Combined CFD and Engine Experiments
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 24, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: Spring Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition SAE International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition
Improved cylinder-to-cylinder distribution of EGR in a 2-L Direct-Injection (DI) Diesel engine has been identified as one enabler to help reach more stringent emission standards. Through a combined effort of modeling, design, and experiment, two manifolds were developed that improve EGR distribution over the original manifold while minimizing design changes to engine components or interfering with the many varied vehicle platform installations.
One of the modified manifolds, an elevated EGR entry (EEE) approach, provided a useful improvement over the original design that meet Euro-II emission standards, and has been put into production as it enabled meeting the Euro III emissions requirements a year early. The second revision, the distributed EGR entry (DEE) design, showed potential for further improvement in EGR distribution. This design has two EGR outlets rather than the one used in the original and EEE manifolds, and was first identified by modeling to be a promising concept. Using rapid prototype parts with variable geometry, over 40 variations of the DEE concept were studied experimentally in an attempt to identify an improved configuration. Parallel CFD modeling studies of just a few configurations pointed to a much-improved design, while the experimental methods used to determine EGR distribution sometimes gave quite misleading results. CFD modeling further identified why the experimental results were sometimes conflicting.
CitationSiewert, R., Krieger, R., Huebler, M., Baruah, P. et al., "Modifying an Intake Manifold to Improve Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in a DI Diesel Engine Using Combined CFD and Engine Experiments," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3685, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3685.
- Krieger R. B., Siewert R. M., Pinson J. A., Gallopoulos N. E., Hilden D. L., Monroe D. R., Rask R. B., Solomon A. S. P., and Zima P., “Diesel Engines: One Option to Power Future Personal Transportation Vehicles,” SAE Paper 972683, August 6-8, 1997, San Diego.
- Ntone F. and Zehr R. L., “Multidimensional Fluid Flow Calculations in Diesel Engine Exhaust Valve-Port Geometries,” SAE Paper No. 930073, March 1-5, 1993, Detroit.
- Yoshizawa K., Mori K, Arai K, and Iiyama A., “Numerical Analysis of Unsteady Exhaust Gas Flow and its Application for Lambda Control Improvement,” ASME Paper No. 99-ICE-251, 1999 Fall Technical Conference
- Mattarelli E., Bainchi G. M., and Ivaldi D., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the EGR System of a New Automobile Automotive Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0224, March 6-9, 2000, Detroit
- Graf G., Hrauda G., and Bartsch P., “Layout of a High Load EGR System for LD, MD, and HD Engines by Means of Simulation”, SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0225, March 6-9, 2000, Detroit
- Ricardo North America, Inc., WAVE user's manual version 3.4, Burr Ridge, IL, USA 1996
- Haworth D. C., El Tahry S. H., Huebler M. S., and Chang S., “Multidimensional Port-and-Cylinder Flow Calculations for Two- and Four-Valve-Per-Cylinder Engines: Influence of Intake Configuration on Flow Structure,” SAE Paper No. 900257, February 26 - March 2, 1990, Detroit.
- Green R. M., “Measuring the Cylinder-to-Cylinder EGR Distribution in the Intake of a Diesel Engine During Transient Operation,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-2866, October 16-19, 2000, Baltimore.