This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Sustainment Measures for Fighter Jet Engines
Technical Paper
2001-01-2975
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The US Air Force (USAF) has evolved a policy for the acquisition of fighter jet engines (FJE). In the 1970s and 1980s that policy placed a premium on FJE performance primarily measured by the metric: thrust/engine weight. In the 1990s, the USAF policy changed from an emphasis on performance to reduced life-cycle cost with a premium on sustainment. This paper reports the results of a study of how the USAF and Corporation Alpha (Alpha) have adapted their processes, practices, and policies to design, develop, manufacture, test, and sustain a family of FJEs. Each member of the family of FJEs is sequentially linked relative to insertion of technology designed to reduce sustainment costs.
In addition to the technology linkages, the development of the family of FJEs selected for this case study is also tracked relative to US Department of Defense and USAF policy and industry design, build, and maintain processes, methods, and tools. This paper discerns the complex, highly integrated manner that characterizes the interaction between (1) technology, (2) policy, and (3) manufacturing and sustainment tools to produce a family of FJEs with improving sustainment qualities and non-degrading performance.
The metric Unscheduled Engine Removals (UER) per 1000 Effective Flight Hours (UER/1000EFH) is used to compare the sustainability of each member of the selected family of FJEs. Our results are based on data obtained through a series of field interviews of USAF and civilian government personnel and Alpha personnel. The US government extensive database containing UER information is the primary source of MRO trends for the FJEs of this study. Our analysis shows that the family of FJEs sustainability, as measured by the UER metric, has not improved beyond 106 EFH for each succeeding generation in the selected FJE family. We conjecture that upstream policy, technology insertion, and manufacturing and sustainment tools are not the primary determinants of sustainability; the manner in which the FJE is used has the greatest influence on sustainability of FJEs.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Lewis, S. and Harris, W., "Sustainment Measures for Fighter Jet Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-2975, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2975.Also In
References
- 1993
- Cooper, W.C. Littlefield, A. H. McCurry, G.E. Design Manual for Maintainability/Human Factors Engineering 1996
- August 4 1997
- Drewes, Robert W The Air Force and the Great Engine War Washington, DC National Defense University Press 1987
- Drouin, Bernadette “CALS: An Essential Strategy for Paperless Interchange of Technical Information for Manufacturing - Current and Future Standards,” CompEuro ‘93, ‘Computers in Design, Manufacturing, and Production’, Proceedings 1993 73 78
- Ellinger, Robert S. When Do You Start to Design R&M into a Product? Concurrent Engineering, CALS, and the R&M Engineer 1994 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium
- Elwood, George, P. “What is CALS All About,” AUTOTESTCON ‘93, IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Proceedings Sept 1993 497 500
- The Engine Handbook: Turbofan, Turbojet, Turboshaft/Turboprop, Reciprocating, and Small Gas Turbines
- Hoffman, Dennis R “An Overview of Concurrent Engineering,” Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium Anaheim, CA January 19–22 1998 1998 1 7
- “McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle,” [Online document] November 4 1999 http://chan.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypie/elevon/baugher_us/f015.html
- http://web.deskbook.osd.mil/scripts/rwisapi.dll/@WebDADSearch.env?CQ_SESSION_KEY=JVTXQLDMUBOE&CQ_QUERY_HANDLE=124131&CQ_CUR_DOCUMENT=2&CQ_VIEW_TEXT=YES&CQ_SAVE[MDI]=YES#FIRSTHIT
- “National Defense Budget Estimates for Fiscal Year 2000,” March 1999