This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Pressure-Sensitive Paint Technology Applied to Low-Speed Automotive Testing
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 05, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: SAE 2001 World Congress
Pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) technology is a technique used to experimentally determine surface pressures on models during wind tunnel tests. The key to this technique is a specially formulated pressure-sensitive paint that responds to, and can be correlated with the local air pressure. Wind tunnel models coated with pressure-sensitive paint are able to yield quantitative pressure data on an entire model surface in the form of light intensity values in recorded images. Quantitative results in terms of pressure coefficients (Cp) are obtained by correlating PSP data with conventional pressure tap data. Only a small number of surface taps are needed to be able to obtain quantitative pressure data with the PSP method. This technique is gaining acceptance so that future automotive wind tunnel tests can be done at reduced cost by eliminating most of the expensive pressure taps from wind tunnel models. A significant advantage of PSP is a much higher spatial resolution mapping of the pressure field than that given by the discrete data available from pressure taps, even when the taps are closely spaced.
Experiments were conducted with the main objective of determining whether PSP could produce useful results on an automotive model at low test velocities. These wind tunnel tests were performed on a 4/10 scale 1995 Ford Transit van. Results were obtained throughout the yaw range of -15° to+15 ° and between dynamic pressures of 16 psf and 60 psf (766 Pa and 2872 Pa). At higher dynamic pressures (above 40 psf or 1914 Pa), the PSP measurements can determine the model surface pressure distribution with ‘reasonable’ (±0.2 Cp with 95% confidence) quantitative accuracy. At lower dynamic pressures, the images have lower signal-to- noise ratios and thus decreased quantitative accuracy. However, the basic trends in the data seen at high dynamic pressures are also evident at low dynamic pressures. This indicates that PSP measurements are capable of qualitatively determining the model surface pressure distribution at dynamic pressures as low as 16 psf (766 Pa). PSP technology was also demonstrated to be very useful for flow diagnostics. A-pillar vortex regions, separated flow regions behind ‘backward-facing steps’, flow reattachment lines, and the effects of model changes and yaw angle could be identified from the PSP results.
CitationDuell, E., Everstine, D., Mehta, R., Bell, J. et al., "Pressure-Sensitive Paint Technology Applied to Low-Speed Automotive Testing," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0626, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0626.
SAE 2001 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V110-6; Published: 2002-09-15
Number: V110-6; Published: 2002-09-15
- McLachlan, B.G. Bell, J.H. “Pressure-Sensitive Paint in Aerodynamic Testing” Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 10 475 480 1995
- Liu, T. Campbell, B.T. Burns, S.P. Sullivan, J.P. “Temperature and Pressure Sensitive Luminescent Paints in Aerodynamics” App. Mech. Rev. 50 4 227 246 1997
- Brown, O. Mehta, R.D. Cantwell, B.J. “Low-Speed Flow Studies Using the Pressure Sensitive Paint Measurement Technique” 31 1 31 13 May 1998 AGARD 81st Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium on Advanced Aerodynamic Measurement Techniques Seattle, WA Sept. 22-25 1997
- Brown, O.C. “Low-Speed Pressure Measurements Using a Luminescent Coating System” Stanford University 2000 Joint Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Tech. Rep. 123 May 2000 Stanford University
- Morris, M.J. Benne, M.E. Crites, R.C. Donovan, J.F. “Aerodynamic Measurements Based on Photoluminescence” AIAA Paper 93-0175, 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, NV 1993
- Crites, R. Benne, M. “Emerging Technology for Pressure Measurement in Wind Tunnels - Pressure Sensitive Paint” AIAA Paper 95-0106 1995
- Bell, J.H. McLachlan, B.G. “Image Registration for Pressure-Sensitive Paint Applications” Experiments in Fluids 22 78 86 1996
- Bell, James H. Hand, L. A. “The Pseudo Wind-off Method for Intensity-Based PSP Measurements” AIAA Paper 98-0568, 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, NV 1998
- Fonov, S. Mosharov, V. Radchenko, V. Engler, R. Klein, C. “Application of the PSP for Investigation of the Oscillating Pressure Fields” AIAA Paper 98-2503, 20th Advanced Measurement & Ground Testing Meeting Albuquerque, NM June 15-18 1998
- Bell, J.H. Schairer, E.T. Hand, L.A. Mehta, R.D. “Surface Pressure Measurements Using Luminescent Coatings” Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics 33 155 206 2001
- Trosin, J. Hermstad D. Bell J. PAINTCP V2.2 User's Guide, Sterling (Software) Technical Note TN-93- 8006-000-48 Sept. 1 1994
- Barlow, J. B. Rae, W. H. Pope, A. Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing 367 427 3rd John Wiley & Sons New York 1999
- Rayle, R. E. “Influence of Orifice Geometry on Static Pressure Measurements” ASME Paper 59-A-234 dec. 1959 1949
- Watanabe, M. Haratia, M. Hayashi, E. “The Effect of Body Shapes on Wind Noise” SAE Paper 780266 SAE Congress Detroit, MI March 1978
- Haruna, S. Nouzawa, T. Kamimoto, I. Sato, H. “An Experimental Analysis and Estimation of Aerodynamic Noise Using a Production Vehicle” SAE Paper 900316 SAE Congress Detroit, MI March 1990
- Haruna, S. Hashiguchi, M. Kamimoto, I. Kuwahara, K. “Numerical Study of Aerodynamic Noise Radiated from a Three-Dimensional Wing” SAE Paper 920341 SAE Congress Detroit, MI March 1992
- Bannister, M. “Drag and Dirt Deposition Mechanisms of External Rear View Mirrors and Techniques used for Optimization” SAE Paper 2000-01-0486 SAE Congress Detroit, MI March 2000