This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Near and Far-Side Adult Front Passenger Kinematics in a Vehicle Rollover
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 05, 2001 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Event: SAE 2001 World Congress
In this study, U.S. accident data was analyzed to determine interior contacts and injuries for front-seated occupants in rollovers. The injury distribution for belted and unbelted, non-ejected drivers and right front passengers (RFP) was assessed for single-event accidents where the leading side of the vehicle rollover was either on the driver or passenger door. Drivers in a roll-left and RFP in roll-right rollovers were defined as near-side occupants, while drivers in roll-right and RFP in roll-left rollovers were defined as far-side occupants.
Serious injuries (AIS 3+) were most common to the head and thorax for both the near and far-side occupants. However, serious spinal injuries were more frequent for the far-side occupants, where the source was most often coded as roof, windshield and interior. Based on the injury sources for both situations, head injuries seem to occur from contact with the roof, windshield (in particular for unbelted occupants) and pillars, while thoracic injuries resulted from contact with steering assembly and the interior.
The field injury data was compared with the Hybrid III responses obtained from simulated mathematical rollovers to better understand occupant kinematics and injury biomechanics. These simulations were validated using laboratory tests. The laboratory tests included the FMVSS 208 dolly rollover, the ADAC corkscrew, curb and soil-trips, bounce-overs and fall-overs.
Based on the mathematical simulations, the kinematics of the front far-side occupant differed from that of the near-side. For the belted far-side occupant, the torso often slipped out of the belt which allows excursion towards the near-side occupant. For the belted near-side occupant, the shoulder belt remained on the upper body during the initial roll phase. The occupant nonetheless moved up and outwards and the head could contact the roof-rail and header areas depending on the rollover condition simulated. The near-side occupant's head crossed the window plane more frequently than the head of the far-side occupant. Dummy kinematics from the simulation help explain the frequency of serious head and thorax injuries reported in the field. Field data analysis and mathematical simulations are useful in understanding injury biomechanics and providing guidance for future testing.
CitationParenteau, C., Gopal, M., and Viano, D., "Near and Far-Side Adult Front Passenger Kinematics in a Vehicle Rollover," SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0176, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0176.
- Bardini, R. Hiller M. “The Contribution Of Occupant And Vehicle Dynamics Simulation To Testing Occupant Safety In Passenger Cars During Rollover” SAE 1999-01-0431 1999
- Cooperider N.K. Hammoud, S.A. Colwell J “Tipped Rollovers” SAE Paper 980022 1998
- DeLeys N.J. Brinkman C.P. “Rollover potential of vehicles on embankments, side slopes, and other roadside features” SAE paper, 870234 1987
- Howard, R.P. “Initial Occupant Kinematics in the High Velocity Vehicle Rollover” Passenger Car Rollover TOPTEC San Diego, CA January 21–22 1999
- Orlowski, K.F. Bundorf, R.T. Moffat, E.A. “Rollover Crash Tests – The Influence of Roof Strength on Injury Mechanics” SAE Paper 851743 1985
- Partyka, S. “Light Passenger Vehicle Rollovers with Serious Occupant Injury” April 15
- Thomas, T.M. Cooperider N.K. Hammoud, S.A. Woley, P.F. “Real World Rollovers – A Crash Test Procedure and Vehicle Kinematics” Proceedings of the 12 th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles 2 Gothenburg, Sweden May 1989
- Yoganadan, N. Pintar F. Haffner, M. Malman D. “Epidemiology and Injury Biomechanics of Motor Vehicle Related Trauma to the Soiine” SAE Publication 892438 223