This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluating the Environmental Advantages of Advanced Vehicles
Technical Paper
2000-01-3102
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
We analyze alternative fuel/engine internal combustion engine and electric technology options that will be available over the next two decades for powering a large proportion of the U.S. light duty fleet (cars and light trucks). Lifetime private (vehicle, battery replacement and fuel) and social (externalities associated with pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions) costs for the vehicle options are estimated and compared to those of a baseline gasoline fueled internal combustion engine automobile. Technological advances continue to improve the efficiency and environmental performance of low sulfur reformulated gasoline fueled internal combustion engine automobiles. In our judgment, two fuels which may challenge gasoline for use in internal combustion engines are compressed natural gas and biomass ethanol. Compressed natural gas would lower our dependence on foreign energy supplies, would result in lower greenhouse gas emissions, and is cleaner burning than petroleum fuels. However, vehicle fuel storage and range, as well as infrastructure issues, are drawbacks. If global warming becomes a major concern, biomass ethanol provides a fuel with no net carbon dioxide emissions, although the fuel price would be more than twice current petroleum prices. Although advanced electric vehicle options such as battery powered, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles promise environmental benefits such as lowering of vehicle (and upstream fuel cycle) emissions and improved fuel economy, in the near term these benefits do not justify their costs.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Lave, L., MacLean, H., and Cobas-Flores, E., "Evaluating the Environmental Advantages of Advanced Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3102, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-3102.Also In
References
- Evaluation of Fuel-Cycle Emissions on a Reactivity Basis: Volume 1-Main Report, Acurex Environmental Final Report Acurex Environmental Corporation California Air Resources Board Mountain View, CA 1996
- Evaluation of Fuel-Cycle Emissions on a Reactivity Basis: Volume 2-Appendices, Acurex Environmental Final Report Acurex Environmental Corporation California Air Resources Board Mountain View, CA 1996
- An, F. Stodolsky, F. Santini, D. Hybrid Options for Light Duty Vehicles Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1999 1999-01-2929
- Delucchi, M.A. A Revised Model of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the Use of Transportation Fuels and Electricity Institute of Transportation Studies. University of California-Davis Davis, CA 1997
- Delucchi, M.A. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the Use of Transportation Fuels and Electricity. Volume 1: Main Text Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 1991 1
- Carnegie Mellon University, Green Design Initiative Pittsburgh, PA 2000
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Evaluation of a Toyota Prius Hybrid System (THS) August 1998
- Hanisch, C. ES&T News 1999 November 1 458A 162A
- Toyota Prius Hybrid Car Recharges its Own Batteries Detroit Free Press September 10 1998
- Kreucher, W.M. Society of Automotive Engineers 1998 982218
- Lave, L.B. MacLean, H.L. An Environmental Economic Evaluation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on the Toyota Prius Working Paper Green Design Initiative, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 2000
- Lave, L. MacLean, H. Hendrickson, C. Lankey, R. A Life-Cycle Analysis of Alternative Automobile Fuel-Propulsion Technologies ES&T 2000
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. Addressing Vehicle Equivalency to Facilitate Meaningful Automobile Comparisons Society of Automotive Engineers 2000 2000-01-1474
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. Environmental Implications of Alternative-Fueled Automobiles: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tradeoffs ES&T 2000 34 225
- MacLean, H.L. Lave, L.B. Joshi, S. Lankey, R.J. J. of the Air & Waste Management Association 2000
- MacLean, H.L. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 1998
- Maples, J. Moore, J. Schaper, V. Patterson, P. Transportation and Fuel Technologies: Performance Analysis Methodology (1998 Update) U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 1998
- Matthews, H, S. Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 1999
- McMichael, F.C. Hendrickson, C.T. IEEE Spectrum February 1998
- Priestley, E. Exxon Research and Engineering Company Annandale, NJ 1999
- Sears Automotive Center Pittsburgh, PA 1999
- Sheehan, J. Camobreco, V. Duffield, J. Graboski, M. Shapouri, H. Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel for Use in an Urban Bus National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO. 1998
- Shnayerson, M. The Car that Could The Inside Story of GM's Revolutionary Electric Vehicle Random House, Inc. New York, NY 1996
- Wang, M. Saricks, C. Santini, D. Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Center for Transportation Research. Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 1999
- Wang, M.Q. Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 1999
- Wang, M.Q. GREET 1.4 Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 1998
- Wang, M.Q. Development and Use of the GREET Model to Estimate Fuel-Cycle Energy Use and Emissions of Various Transportation Technologies and Fuels Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL 1996
- Wooley, R. Ruth, M. Sheehan, J. Ibsen, K. Majdeski, H. Galvez, A. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO. July 1999