This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Understanding the Life-Cycle Costs and Environmental Profile of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Fuel
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 26, 2000 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The use of a soy-based diesel fuel (biodiesel) has potential advantages over the use of a conventional petroleum diesel fuel including:
- Reduced dependence on foreign petroleum
- Lowering of greenhouse gas emissions
- Less air pollution and related public health risks in urban areas
A life cycle study performed by the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Office of Energy and Ecobalance (completed in May 1998) helped to quantify the environmental benefits of the “cradle-to-grave” production and use of biodiesel. The study showed, for example, that substituting 100% biodiesel for petroleum diesel in urban buses reduced the life cycle emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) by 78%. The study also pointed out some trade-offs of using biodiesel including increased life cycle hydrocarbon and NOx emissions.
Regardless of its environmental benefits, one of the major hurdles in the use of biodiesel is that its cost is higher than that of petroleum diesel fuel. An attempt was made to assess the full costs of using either biodiesel or petroleum diesel fuel in an urban bus, where both the direct and indirect (or external) costs were computed. These external costs, also called “externalities”, are environmental costs imposed on society, individuals and the environment for which an organization is not currently held financially accountable. The cost analysis study found that existing external cost data was extremely variable. However, targets could be defined to determine a breakeven point where the use of biodiesel was cost competitive.
CitationCamobreco, V., Sheehan, J., Duffield, J., and Graboski, M., "Understanding the Life-Cycle Costs and Environmental Profile of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Fuel," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1487, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1487.
- Adams, C. H. Luttges, W.E. Mullen, M. Rand, M.C. Peters, J.F. Schroer, B.J. Ziemke, M.C. “Study on Production, Marketing, and Utilization of Degummed Soybean Oil as a Diesel Fuel Extender” UAH Report No. 297 University of Alabama in Huntsville 1981
- Ahouissoussi, N. Wetzstein, M. “Life-Cycle Costs of Alternative Fuels: Is Biodiesel Cost Competitive For Urban Buses?” United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service November 1995
- Congressional Research Service (CRS) “Global Climate Change: Market-Based Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gases II” Report No. 97-057 Washington, DC 1997
- Energy Information Administration (EIA) “Electricity Generation and Environmental Externalities: case studies” September 1995
- Graboski, M.S. “Emissions from Biodiesel Blends and Neat Biodiesel from a 1991 Model Series 60 Engine Operating at High Altitude” Final Report to NREL 1994
- Howell, S. “Draft ASTM Proposed Specification for Biodiesel” ASTM Biodiesel Task Force November 1995
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) “Life Cycle Inventory of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel For Use in an Urban Bus” study sponsored by USDA and USDOE May 1998
- Tellus Institute “The CSG/Tellus Packaging Study” prepared for The Council of State Governments (Lexington, KY) US EPA (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy) May 1992
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service “Biodiesel Development: New Markets for Conventional and Genetically Modified Agricultural Products” Economic Report No. 770 Sept 1998