This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Practical Considerations for an E85-Fueled Vehicle Conversion
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 25, 1999 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
An original equipment gasoline-fueled 1999 Chevrolet Silverado pickup with a 5.3-liter, V8 engine was converted to operate on E85 (85% denatured ethanol and 15% gasoline). The simplest conversion of a gasoline-fueled vehicle to E85 requires modification to the fuel system, including use of components that are compatible with ethanol and fuel injectors that provide sufficient E85 for the stock engine control module (ECM) to effectively control engine operation. To retain the stock ECM, higher flow rate fuel injectors that provide approximately 40% more E85 than gasoline are required. With no engine modifications and similar engine control strategies, performance predictions show an approximate 7% torque and power increase for E85 over gasoline. The increase is primarily due to the specific energy differences between E85 and gasoline, although there should be a slight charge cooling benefit for E85 as a result of its higher heat of vaporization. Actual performance measurements result in an average increase in torque and power for E85 of ∼2.5%, although the measurements show a difference in equivalence ratio at WOT (∼1.11 for gasoline and ∼1.02 for E85). Based on miles per actual gallon of fuel, fuel economy predictions and constant speed on-road measurements result in a penalty for E85 of ∼24% when compared to gasoline. FTP city and highway tests yield fuel economy penalties for E85 of ∼32% and ∼31%, respectively, which agree with the Auto/Oil result of ∼29%.
CitationWicker, R., Hutchison, P., Acosta, O., and Matthews, R., "Practical Considerations for an E85-Fueled Vehicle Conversion," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3517, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-3517.
- “1999 Ethanol Vehicle Challenge Calibration Guide,” Revision A, General Motors Corporation, January 1999.
- Lutz, B., Reinhart, Ku, et. al., “Conversion of a 1997 Malibu to Dedicated E85 with Emphasis on Cold Start and Cold Driveablity,” SAE publication SP-1453, 1998 Ethanol Vehicle Challenge, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1998.
- Shin, Y. (1996), “Liquid fuel behavior in the mixture preparation process during starting and warm-up in a spark ignition engine”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
- Chen, K.C., Cheng W.K., Van Doren J.M., Murphy J.P. III, Hargus M.D., and McSweeney S.A. (1996), “Time-resolved, speciated emissions from an SI engine during starting and warm-up”, SAE Paper 961955.
- Stovell, C., Matthews R.D., Johnson B.E., Ng H.K., and Larsen B., “Emissions and Fuel Economy of a 1998 Toyota with a Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE 1999-01-1527.
- Edwards, J., Tidmarsh D., and Willock M. (1996), “Evaluation of total HCs and individual species for SI engine cold start and comparison with predictions”, IMechE paper C517/040/96. IMechE Conference Transaction 1996-5: Application of Powertrain and Fuel Technologies to Meet Emissions Standards, pp. 337-352.
- (1995), “Exhaust emissions of E85 ethanol fuel and gasoline in flexible/variable fuel vehicles,” Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program Technical Bulletin No. 16, July.
- Pahl, R.H., and McNally M. J. (1990), “Fuel blending and analysis for the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program”, SAE Paper 902098.
- Acedo, E., Acosta, Holloway, et. al., “Development of the UTEP E85-Fueled Vehicle,” SAE publication SP-1453, 1998 Ethanol Vehicle Challenge, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1998.
- Borman, G.L. and Ragland K.W. (1998), Combustion Engineering, McGraw Hill, Boston.