This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Seat Belt Survey: Identification and Assessment of Noncollision Markings
Technical Paper
1999-01-0441
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The assessment of seat belt usage during a collision is typically made by considering four types of evidence: (1) the nature and location of the occupant’s injuries, (2) the presence or absence of occupant contact marks in the passenger compartment, (3) the occupant’s final position and (4) markings on the restraint system. This paper focuses specifically on seat belt restraint system markings.
Markings or observable anomalies on the webbing and restraint system hardware can be classified into two categories: (1) those caused by collision forces, or “loading marks” and (2) those created by noncollision situations, or “normal usage marks”. Some normal usage marks can appear visually similar to loading marks. The purpose of this paper is to help the investigator distinguish between occupant loading marks and normal usage marks by presenting examples of marks found on belt restraint systems that have never experienced occupant loading in a collision. A survey of the driver’s belt system in 307 vehicles was conducted. Forty examples of a variety of normal usage marks are illustrated.
The most commonly observed types of normal usage marks were: grooves, buffing, abrasions and grime buildup on the D-ring and latch plate; scratches on the latch plate tongue; fiber disruptions, staining, transfers or discolorations, cupping, folding and fraying on the webbing; latch plate tongue insertion marks, and contact marks on the buckle from the console, seat or occupant; and transfers or abrasions on other interior surfaces from interaction with restraint system components.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Characteristics of Seat Belt Restraint System Markings |
Technical Paper | Diagnosis of Seat Belt Usage in Accidents |
Technical Paper | Automotive Restraint Loading Evidence for Moderate Speed Impacts and a Variety of Restraint Conditions |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Bready, J., Nordhagen, R., and Kent, R., "Seat Belt Survey: Identification and Assessment of Noncollision Markings," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0441, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0441.Also In
References
- [Automotive News 1998] 1998 Market Databook Crain Communications Inc. Detroit, MI
- Cromack, J.R. Schneider, D. Blaisdell, D. Occupant Kinematics & Belt Markings in Crash Tests with Unrestrained and Partially Restrained Test Dummies 34th Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Oct. 1990 Scottsdale, AZ
- DeRosa, D. Larsonneur, J.F. Seat Belt Improvements SAE 840400
- DeRosa, D. Larsonneur, J.F. Seat Belt Improvements SAE 840400
- Gorski, Z.M. German, B.A. Nowak, E.S. Examination and Analysis of Seat Belt Loading Marks Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA 35 1 1990 69 79
- Green, R.N. German, A. Gorsky, Z.M. Nowak, E.S. Tryphonopoulos, J.P. Improper Use of Occupant Restraints: Case Studies From Real-World Collisions 30th Annual Proceedings for Automotive Medicine Oct. 1986 Montreal, Quebec
- Jakstis, M.W. Brown, R. “Field Investigation of Airbag, Seat Belt, and Interior Markings” SAE Airbag Design and Performance TOPTEC August, 1997 Costa Mesa, CA
- Moffatt, C.A. Moffatt, E.A. Weiman, T.A. Diagnosis of Seat Belt Usage in Accidents International Congress & Exposition Detriot Michigan Feb., 1984 (SAE 840396 )
- Niederer, P. Zollinger, F.W. Zollinger “Adverse Effects of Seat Belt and Causes of Belt Failures in Severe Car Accidents in Switzerland During 1976 (SAE 770916)
- Severy, D.M. Blaisdell, D.M. Horn, L.S. Motorist Head and Body Impact Analysis, Methodologies and Reconstruction SAE 850097