This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Operant Friction Coefficient of Prephosphated Galvanneal under Punch Stretching
Technical Paper
1999-01-0024
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Finite element analysis of the limiting dome height (LDH) test has been conducted in order to determine the operant (or effective) friction coefficient pertaining to prephosphated galvanneal under punch stretching conditions. Simulation results indicate that an effective friction coefficient (μ) of about 0.05, which is substantially lower than the experimentally measured drawbead friction coefficient of 0.11, would be necessary to obtain the experimentally observed LDH formability enhancement with prephosphated galvanneal coating over a drawing quality steel substrate. The work also demonstrates that the effect of friction on dome height and minor strain at failure depends on specimen width and substrate strength level, with the relationship being quite nonlinear. The apparent difference in friction behavior between punch stretching and draw bead conditions raises concerns about the use of a single friction coefficient in computer simulation models that are widely used today for up-front die feasibility analysis.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Raghavan, K., "Operant Friction Coefficient of Prephosphated Galvanneal under Punch Stretching," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0024, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0024.Also In
References
- Kudo H. Azushima A. “Interaction of surface microstructure and lubricant in metal forming tribology,” Proceedings 2 nd International Conference on Technology of Plasticity Stuttgart 1987 373 384
- Emmens W.C. Monfort G. “The influence of process conditions and surface characteristics on friction at low pressure,” Advanced Technology of Plasticity Kyoto 1990 1277 1284
- Emmens W.C. “The influence of surface roughness on friction,” Proceedings of the 15 th Biennial IDDRG Congress Dearborn, MI 1988 63 70
- Schey J.A. “Speed effects in drawbead simulation,” J. Materials Processing Technology 1996 57 146 154
- Raghavan K.S. Speer J.G. “Interaction of Coating Type and Deformation Mode on Formability of Automotive Sheet Steels,” 35 th Mechanical Working and Steel Processing Conf., ISS-AIME XXXI 1994 107 123
- Brazier W.G. Thompson R.W. “The effects of zinc coatings, die materials and lubricants on sheet metal formability,” SAE Technical Paper No. 860434 1986
- Raghavan K.S. Garrett T.J., Jr. Speer J.G. “Sheet steel surface treatments for enhanced formability,” Analysis of Autobody Stamping Technology (SP 1021) SAE International Warrendale, PA 1994 193 203
- Nine H.D. “Drawbead forces in sheet metal forming,” Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming Koistinen D. P. Wang N.M. Plenum Publishing Corporation New York, NY 1978 179 211
- Ghosh A.K. “The effect of lateral drawing-in on stretch formability,” Metals Engineering Quarterly 1975 15 53
- Ayres R.A. Brazier W.G. Sajewski V.F. “Evaluating the GMR limiting dome height test as a new measure of press formability,” J. Appl. Metalworking 1979 41 49
- Izworski N. Graf A. “Obtaining LDH stability,” Autobody Stamping Technology Progress, SP-865 SAE International Warrendale, PA 1991 41 46
- Belytschko T. Tsai C.S. “Explicit algorithms for nonlinear dynamics of shells,” 48 ASME 1981 209 231
- Keeler S.P. Brazier W.G. “Relationship between material characterization and press shop formability,” Microalloying 75 New York, NY 1975 517 530