This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Using Life Cycle Management to Evaluate Lead-Free Electrocoat
‡
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Environmental costs are a delayed financial burden that result from product decisions made early in the product life cycle--early material choices may create regulatory and waste management costs that were not factored into the acquisition cost. This paper outlines a step-wise approach to determine decision points; environmental, health, safety and recycling (EHS&R) cost drivers that affect decisions; and sources of information required to conduct a Life Cycle Management (LCM) review. Additionally, how LCM fits into the larger concurrent engineering framework is illustrated with an electrocoat primer example. Upstream and downstream supply chain processes are reviewed, as well as organizational challenges that affect the decision process.
Topic
Citation
Kainz, R., Prokopyshen, M., and Franklin, W., "Using Life Cycle Management to Evaluate Lead-Free ElectrocoatAlso In
Design for Environmentally Safe Automotive Products and Processes
Number: SP-1263; Published: 1997-02-24
Number: SP-1263; Published: 1997-02-24
References
- INDIA'S ECOMARK PROGRAM I NTERNATIONAL E NVIRONMENT N ETWORK P 2 JULY/AUGUST 1996 21ST EDITION
- DELADURANTEY, C.E. ET AL “E NVIRONMENT , H EALTH AND S AFETY : A D ECISION M ODEL FOR P RODUCT D EVELOPMENT ” 960407 , SAE I NTERNATIONAL WARRENDALE, PA I NTERNATIONAL C ONGRESS & E XPOSITION FEBRUARY 26-29 1996 P 2
- FELLER, J.G. “B RUSHING UP ON L EAD P AINT R ULES AND L IABILITY C ONCERNS ECON T HE M AGAZINE OF E NVIRONMENTAL R EMEDIATION OL 11 O 7 JULY 1996 PP 28 29
- CHRYSLER CORPORATION VEHICLE ENGINEERING OFFICE, CHARACTERISTIC STANDARD CS-9003 “ E NVIRONMENTAL , H EALTH, AND O CCUPATIONAL S AFETY R EQUIREMENTS FOR R EGULATED S UBSTANCES OR P ROCESSES AND V EHICLE R ECYCLING R EPORTING R EQUIREMENTS ” JUNE 1995 PP 5 6