This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Propulsion Systems for V/STOL Supersonic Combat Aircraft
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Three lift/propulsion concepts for a V/STOL supersonic combat aircraft have been compared. The intention was to show the effect of the propulsion system on aircraft weight and size, performance, and life cycle costs for:
-
1
Vectored thrust with Plenum Chamber Burning (bypass air augmentation)
-
2
Lift engines and a lift/cruise reheated turbofan
-
3
A reheated lift/cruise turbofan with a remote augmented lift system (RALS)
For a postulated deck-launched intercept mission, the vectored thrust propulsion system with Plenum Chamber Burning gives the smallest and cheapest aircraft having the required performance. In addition, for a given take-off ground run the vectored thrust powered aircraft has the longest fighter escort mission radius.
Authors
Citation
Lewis, W. and Simpkin, P., "A Comparison of Propulsion Systems for V/STOL Supersonic Combat Aircraft," SAE Technical Paper 801141, 1980, https://doi.org/10.4271/801141.Also In
References
- Lewis W J Hurd R ‘Augmented Vectored Thrust Engines and the Problem of Avoiding Hot Gas Recirculation’ Paper No 79-GT-10 ASME Gas Turbine Conference San Diego March 1979