This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dynamic Versus Static Spring Rates for Vibration Mounts
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Dynamic testing yields more realistic values for the spring rates of rubber mounts used in vibration isolation systems. Shore durometer, 20% load deflection, tensile modulus, and other static tests have generally shown little relation to the actual spring behavior under field conditions.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Theoretical and Numerical Analysis of Fibrous Composite C-Springs |
Technical Paper | Noise Factor Effects on Leaf Spring Fatigue Life |
Technical Paper | Modal Analysis of Chladni Plate Using Cymatics |
Authors
Citation
Larsen, R., "Dynamic Versus Static Spring Rates for Vibration Mounts," SAE Technical Paper 660599, 1966, https://doi.org/10.4271/660599.Also In
References
- Davey A. B. Payne A. R. “Rubber in Engineering Practices. ” London Maclaren and Sons Ltd. 1965
- Gehman S. D. “Rubber Chemistry and Technology.” 30 1957 1202
- Harris C. M. Crede C. E. “Shock and Vibration Handbook.” 2 New York McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. 1961
- Lowman M. Keller H. E. “Rubber Chemistry and Technology.” 37 1964 866
- Marshall J. W. “Engineering Uses of Rubber.” New York McPherson and Klemin, Reinhold 1956