This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Biofidelity of THOR 5th Percentile Female ATD in Ankle Eversion and Inversion

Journal Article
2020-01-0528
ISSN: 2641-9645, e-ISSN: 2641-9645
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Biofidelity of THOR 5th Percentile Female ATD in Ankle Eversion and Inversion
Sector:
Citation: Kulkarni, S., Roberts, C., Foltz, P., and Forman, J., "Biofidelity of THOR 5th Percentile Female ATD in Ankle Eversion and Inversion," SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 2(6):3197-3202, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0528.
Language: English

Abstract:

Females have higher frequency and risk of foot and ankle injuries in motor vehicle collisions than similar-sized males. Therefore, lower extremity biofidelity and accurate injury prediction of female ATDs is critical. This paper aims to compare the THOR 5th percentile female (THOR-05F) anthropomorphic test device (ATD) response with male and female PMHS data of various sizes under ankle inversion and eversion. The THOR-05F lower extremity was subjected to dynamic inversion and eversion ankle loading with a constant 2000N axial force applied through the tibia. Twelve THOR-05F tests (3 inversion and 3 eversion on both, left and right legs) were performed with boundary conditions consistent with previous post-mortem human subject (PMHS) lower extremity tests. The biofidelity of THOR-05F ankle stiffness was evaluated via comparison of measured and equal-stress equal-velocity scaled data (using mass-based scale factors) from previous PMHS datasets with mid-size males, small females and larger females. THOR-05F ankle moment-angle response falls within the range of previous mid-sized male and larger female PMHS test data for eversion, when scaled to a small female. However, when compared to PMHS response measured on small female subjects, the THOR-05F response was less stiff in both inversion and eversion. The THOR-05F moments were 65% and 90% less stiff in eversion and inversion respectively, when compared to the average of the measured small female PMHS dataset at 25° ankle rotation. Because ATD stiffness differs from measured PMHS ankle stiffness, care should be taken when applying PMHS-based injury risk functions (IRF) to the THOR-05F ankle.