Influence of the Accuracy of Transfer Functions Description on the Perception of Auralised Sounds
Published June 13, 2018 by SAE International in United States
Annotation of this paper is available
Event: 10th International Styrian Noise, Vibration & Harshness Congress: The European Automotive Noise Conference
During the development of a car, auralization allows listening to the expected sound of the prototype. This needs the computation of transfer functions. How detailed should these transfer functions be in order to provide a sound which is close to the real one? This paper addresses this question through an experimental process. A measured transfer function (between a force input to a chassis and a microphone in a truck cabin) was simplified by different ways (reduction of frequency resolution, averaging, resonance displacements…). Transfer functions thus obtained were used to filter an engine source signal. The resulting sounds were presented to listeners, whose task was to detect a difference between each sound and the reference one (i.e. the one obtained with the original transfer function). Results indicated that, in the middle and high frequency range, this difference is hardly detectable even when using strongly modified transfer functions. In the low frequency range, as the source signal has a strong harmonic structure, resonance frequencies can be easily detectable. Results were analysed using a loudness model (from Moore and Glasberg) and can give first ideas about how accurate a transfer function should be in order to be used for auralization.
CitationAujogue, N. and Parizet, E., "Influence of the Accuracy of Transfer Functions Description on the Perception of Auralised Sounds," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1490, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1490.
- Riemann, D., Sottek, R., Naritomi, T., Kishita, S., and Yamada, A. “Interactive Auralization of Powertrain Sounds Using Measured and Simulated Excitation,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2214, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2214.
- Toole, F. and Olive, S. , “The Modification of Timbre by Resonances: Perception and Measurement,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 36(3):122-142, 1988.
- Bücklein, R. , “The Audibility of Frequency Response Irregularities,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 29(3):126-131, 1981.
- Møller, H., Minnaar, P., Olesen, S., Christensen, F., and Plogsties, J. , “On the Audibility of All-Pass Phase in Electroacoustical Transfer Functions,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 55(3):113-134, 2007.
- Faure, J. and Marquis-Favre, C. , “Perceptual Assessment of the Influence of Structural Parameters for a Radiating Plate,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica 91(1):77-90, 2005.
- Marquis-Favre, C. and Faure, J. , “Auditory Evaluation of Sounds Radiated from a Vibrating Plate with Various Viscoelastic Boundary Conditions,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica 94(3): 419-432, 2008, doi:10.3813/AAA.918050.
- Nykänen, A., Johnsson, R., Sirkka, A., and Johansson, O. , “Assessment of the Change in Similarity Judgements of Auralized Engine Sounds Caused by Changes in Frequency Resolution of Transfer Functions,” Applied Acoustics 72(2):115-123, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.10.007.
- Gerges, Y., Hwang, H., Ege, K., Maxit, L., and Sandier, C. , “Vibroacoustic Modeling of a Trimmed Truck Cab in the Mid Frequency Range,” Proc. InterNoise 2015, San Francisco, United States, 2015, 60.
- Ljung, L. , “System Identification,”. In: Signal Analysis and Prediction. (Springer, 1998), 163-173.
- Fazenda, B., Davies, W., and Avis, M. , “Difference Limen for the Q Factor of Room Modes,” Presented at Audio Engineering Society Convention 115, Audio Engineering Society, 2003.
- Gescheider, G. , Psychophysics: The Fundamentals (Psychology Press, 2013).
- Moore, B. and Glasberg, B. , “A Revision of Zwicker's Loudness Model,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica 82(2):335-345, 1996.