This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Extension of the Honda-DRI “Safety Impact Methodology” (SIM) for the NHTSA Advanced Crash Avoidance Technology (ACAT) Program and Application to a Prototype Advanced Collision Mitigation Braking System

Journal Article
2009-01-0781
ISSN: 1946-3995, e-ISSN: 1946-4002
Published April 20, 2009 by SAE International in United States
Extension of the Honda-DRI “Safety Impact Methodology” (SIM) for the NHTSA Advanced Crash Avoidance Technology (ACAT) Program and Application to a Prototype Advanced Collision Mitigation Braking System
Sector:
Citation: Zellner, J., Van Auken, R., Chiang, D., Broen, P. et al., "Extension of the Honda-DRI “Safety Impact Methodology” (SIM) for the NHTSA Advanced Crash Avoidance Technology (ACAT) Program and Application to a Prototype Advanced Collision Mitigation Braking System," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars – Mech. Syst. 2(1):875-894, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0781.
Language: English

References

  1. FARS Analytic Reference Guide 1975 to 1997 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 1997
  2. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) Crashworthiness Data System Analytical Users Manual National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 1997
  3. 1996 National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) Pedestrian Crashworthiness Data System Analytical Users Manual National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 2002
  4. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimates System (1988–2000) Analytical Users Manual National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 2001
  5. National Vehicle Population Profile® Source: Copyright © 2002 R. L. Polk & Co. 2001
  6. Sugimoto, Y. Sauer, C. W. “Effectiveness Estimation Method for Advanced Driver Assistance System and its Application to Collision Mitigation Brake System,” Paper No. 05-0148-O, 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, D.C. June 6–9 2005
  7. Suzuki, H., et al. “Development of a Prototype Safety Analysis System to Assess and Forecast Vehicle Safety,” Technical Paper 2006-01-0718 , SAE, Warrendale 2006
  8. Fleck, J. T. Butler, F. E. Validation of the Crash Victim Simulator, Vol. 1: Engineering Manual Part 1: Analytical Formulation, DOT HS 806 279 US DOT Washington, D.C. 1981
  9. Obergefell, L. A. Gardner, T. R. Kaleps, I. Fleck, J. T. Articulated Total Body Model Enhancements, Harry G Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory January 1988
  10. Draper, N. R. Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis Second Edition John Wiley & Sons New York 1981
  11. Matlab 7 Function Reference The Mathworks Natick, MA 2008
  12. Weir, D. H. Shortwell, C. P. Johnson, W. A. “Dynamics of Vehicle Related Driver Control,” Technical Paper 680194 , SAE, Warrendale, PA 1968
  13. Bryson, A. E. Ho. Y. C. Applied Optimal Control, Revised Printing Hemisphere Publishing Washington 1975
  14. Van Auken, R. M. Zellner, J. W. Smith, T. A. Kebschull, S. A. “Proposal to: Select a “nationally representative” sample of cases for risk/benefit analysis based on police census data and in-depth cases from potentially biased samples,” 2003
  15. APEX Reference Manual 3.0 Beta NASA Ames Research Center 2005
  16. Freed, M. A. Simulating Human Performance in Complex, Dynamic Environments Ph.D. Dissertation Northwestern University 1998
  17. Hart, S. G. Dahn, D. Atencio, A. Dalal, K. M. “Evaluation and application of MIDAS v2.0,” Technical Paper 2001-01-2648 , SAE, Warrendale 2001
  18. Braver, E. Kyrychenko, S. Efficacy of Side Airbags in Reducing Driver Deaths in Driver-Side Collisions Insurance Institute for Highway Safety August 2003
  19. Ward’s Automotive Yearbook Wards Communications Detroit
  20. Hellman, K. H. Heavenrich, R. M. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2004 US Environmental Protection Agency April 2004
  21. Najm, W. G. daSilva, M. P. Wiacek, C. J. “Safety Benefits Estimation of an Intelligent Cruise Control System Using Field Operational Test Data,” Technical Paper 1999-01-2950 , SAE, Warrendale 1999
  22. Najm, W. G. daSilva, M. P. Wiacek, C. J. “Estimation of Crash Injury Severity Reduction for Intelligent Vehicle Safety Systems,” Technical Paper 2000-01-1354 , SAE, Warrendale 2000
  23. Kuchar, A. C. “A Systems Modeling Methodology for Estimation of Harm in the Automotive Crash Environment,” Paper No. 354, 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles 6 June 2001
  24. Fleiss, J. L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions Second Edition John Wiley & Sons New York 1981
  25. Neale, V. N. “An Overview of the 100-Car Naturalistic Study and Findings,” Paper No. 05-0400, 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, D.C. June 6–9 2005
  26. Consumer Information New Car Assessment Program; Rollover Resistance,” Federal Register 68 No. 198 October 14 2003

Cited By