Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Influence of Different Semi Active Control Strategies on the Performance of Macpherson Suspension Kinematic Parameters

Journal Article
2008-01-2596
ISSN: 1946-391X, e-ISSN: 1946-3928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2596
Published October 07, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Influence of Different Semi Active Control Strategies on the Performance of Macpherson Suspension Kinematic Parameters
Sector:
Citation: Fallah, M., Bhat, R., and Xie, W., "Influence of Different Semi Active Control Strategies on the Performance of Macpherson Suspension Kinematic Parameters," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 1(1):222-229, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2596.
Language: English

References

  1. Zribi M. Karkoub M. 2004 Robust control of a car suspension system using magnetorheological dampers Journal of Vibration and Control 10 507 524
  2. Choi S. Lee H. Park Y. 2002 H∞ control performance of a full-vehicle suspension featuring magnetorheological dampers Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics 38 5 341 360
  3. Zhang Y. Alleyne A. 2005 A practical and effective approach to active suspension control Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics 43 5 305 330
  4. Sie W. Lian R. Lin B. 2006 Enhancing grey prediction fuzzy controller for active suspension systems Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics 44 5 407 430
  5. Karnopp D. Crosby M. J. Harwood R. A. 1974 Vibration control using semi-active force generators, Trans. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 96 2 619 626
  6. Valasek M. Novak M. Sika Z. Vakulin O. 1997 Extended ground-hook new concept of semi-active control of truck's suspension Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics 27 5 289 303
  7. Ahmadian M. Vahdati N. 2006 Transient response of semi-active suspensions with hybrid control Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures 17 145 153
  8. Ahmadian M. Pare C. 2000 A quarter-car experimental analysis of alternative semi-active control methods Journal of Intelligent Materials Systems and Structures 11 604 612
  9. Goncalves F. D. Ahmadian M. 2003 A hybrid control policy for semi-active vehicle suspensions Journal of Shock and Vibration 10 59 69
  10. Batterbee D., C. Sims, N., D. 2007 Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of magnetorheological dampers for vehicle suspension systems, Proceedings of the I MECHE Part I Journal of Systems & Control Engineering 221 2 265 278
  11. Yi K. Song B. S. 1999 A new adaptive sky-hook control of vehicle semi-active suspensions, Proceedings of the I MECHE Part D Journal of Automotive Engineering 213 3 293 303
  12. Sohn H. C. Hong K. S. Hedrick J. K. 2002 Modified skyhook control of semi-active suspensions: a new model, gain scheduling, and hardware-in-the-Loop tuning Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 124 1 158 167
  13. Shen Y. Golnaraghi M., R. Heppler G. R. 2006 Semi-active vibration control schemes for suspension systems using magnetorheological dampers Journal of Vibration and Control 12 1 3 24
  14. Fallah M. S. Bhat R. Xie W. F. 2008 New nonlinear model of Macpherson suspension system for ride control applications American Control conference Seattle, WA, USA June 11 12
  15. Sammier D. Sename O. Dugard L. 2003 Sky-hook and H∞ control of semi-active suspensions: some pratical aspects Journal of Vehicle System Dynamics 39 4 279 308

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Kinematics and Compliance Analysis of a 3.5 Tonne Load Capacity Independent Front Suspension for LCV
Technical Paper Vehicle Handling Analysis Using Linearisation Around Non-Linear Operating Conditions
Technical Paper Active Kinematics Suspension for a High Performance Sports Car