This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Debugging the Driver: Cause and Effect, Delusions of Adequacy and the Supporting Technologies of the Automotive Social Experience
Published October 21, 2002 by Convergence Transportation Electronics Association in United States
Annotation ability available
Do the same thing over and over and over and expect different results? Crazy! This guy needs therapy.
The objective is safe, efficient travel/transport. Newton, Darwin and Malthus gave us some guiding principles.
Cars don't crash, people crash them. They crash them often and they have been crashing them for decades. Unless something is done, we can expect the same in the next decade(s). Perhaps a better car would help.
“Iceberg Strikes Titanic”, the New York World (newspaper), April 14, 1912
If we could only build and equip a better boat.
The interface between man, machine and mobility is complex and less than ideal or desirable. The collective behavior of the driving population (188 million, U.S.) has long been considered the ‘lowest common denominator’ in the progress equation; unreliable and difficult or unlikely to improve. Given that equation, perhaps, the population should be restricted from the control of their own “personal discretionary mobility” … “for their own good”. The property damage, injuries and fatalities are meticulously documented in gruesome proportions. Society has acclimated to these unfortunate sociometric norms, these decades of kinetic consequence.
“When will you decide that it's good enough?”
TV character Ralph Cramden to his wife Alice, Jackie Gleason and Audrey Meadows on the “Honeymooners”
Can driver behavior be further improved to become an ‘integer’, a positive component … contributing to the sum of both individual and common good?
The “intelligence potential” of the driver(s) is the least developed resource.
CitationGreen, R., "Debugging the Driver: Cause and Effect, Delusions of Adequacy and the Supporting Technologies of the Automotive Social Experience," SAE Technical Paper 2002-21-0043, 2002.
- Report to Congress “Research Agenda for an Improved Novice Driver Education Program” U.S.DOT, NHTSA 1994
- “Traffic Safety Facts 1999; A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Reporting System and the General Estimates System” U.S. Dot, NHTSA
- “Driving Task Analysis; Improving the Quality of Driver Performance” Instructor Credential Program, The Coalition for Road and Traffic Safety, The American Driver and Traffic Safety Education Association and The Indiana University of Pennsylvania 1998
- Hansman John “The coming Transition in Automobile Cockpits; Insights from Aerospace” MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT Media Lab
- Gladwell Malcolm “Wrong Turn; How the fight to make America's Highways safer went off course” New Yorker June 2001
- Loreno L. Clinton K. “Changing Road User Behavior; What Works What Doesn't” Northport Associates 1998
- Kuchar James K. “Transportation sensors and Controls; Collision Avoidance, Traffic Management and ITS” Proceedings Reprint, the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 1997
- Wiacek C. Najm W. Driver/Vehicle Characteristics in Rear-End Precrash Scenarios Based on the General Estimates System (GES) SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0817
- Garrott W. Riley Mazzae Elizabeth “An Overview of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's” Light Vehicle Antilock Brake Systems Research Program, SAE Paper 1999-01-1286
- Johnston S. Tijerina L Guenther D. Heydinger G. “Consumer Braking Performance information Initiative” SAE paper 199-0101291