Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Expert’s Heuristic Biases in Airport Predictive Risk Assessments

Journal Article
09-10-01-0002
ISSN: 2327-5626, e-ISSN: 2327-5634
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/09-10-01-0002
Published October 12, 2021 by SAE International in United States
Expert’s Heuristic Biases in Airport Predictive Risk Assessments
Sector:
Citation: Cunha, D. and Andrade, M., "Expert’s Heuristic Biases in Airport Predictive Risk Assessments," SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 10(1):23-50, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/09-10-01-0002.
Language: English

References

  1. International Civil Aviation Organization Annex 19—Safety Management 2nd ed. Montreal International Civil Aviation Organization 2016 46
  2. Ayhan , B. and Tokdemir , O. Accident Analysis for Construction Safety Using Latent Class Clustering and Artificial Neural Networks Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 146 3 2020 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001762
  3. International Air Transport Association IATA Safety Report 2019 56th 2020 978-92-9264-170-2
  4. Yilmaz , A. Strategic Approach to Managing Human Factors Risk in Aircraft Maintenance Organization: Risk Mapping Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 91 4 2019 654 668 https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-06-2018-0160
  5. Ashford , N. , Coutu , P. , and Beasley , J. Airport Operations 3rd ed. New York McGraw-Hill Education 2013 640 9780071775847
  6. Kyseľová , V. Risk Management in Air Transport and Insurance International Scientific Conference Management Serbia 2012 6
  7. Shmueli , G. To Explain or to Predict? Statistical Science 25 3 2010 289 310 https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330
  8. Das , K. and Dey , A. Quantifying the Risk of Extreme Aviation Accidents Physica A 463 2016 345 355 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.023
  9. Federal Aviation Agency FAA System Safety Handbook—Principles of System Safety Washington, DC 2000 18
  10. International Civil Aviation Organization Doc 9859—Safety Management Manual (SMM) Montreal International Civil Aviation Organization 2018 192
  11. Kirkpatrick , C. and Parker , D. Regulatory Impact Assessment—Towards Better Regulation? 1st ed. Cheltenham Edward Elgar 2007 285 978-1845424121
  12. Kirkpatrick , C. and Parker , D. 2012 47
  13. OECD 2012 35 http://www.oecd.org/regreform/regulatorypolicy/2012recommendation.htm
  14. Mazur , A. Bias in Risk-Benefit Analysis Technology in Society 7 1 1985 25 30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(85)90014-4
  15. Dekay , M. , Small , M. , Fischbeck , P. , Farrow , R. et al. Risk-Based Decision Analysis in Support of Precautionary Policies Journal of Risk Research 5 4 2002 391 417 https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870210166202
  16. Cunha , D. , Andrade , M. , Prado , L. , Santana , L. et al. Risk Assessment in Airport Maintenance Runway Condition Using MCDA-C Journal of Air Transport Management 90 2021 101948 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101948
  17. Sun , B. , Wei , M. , Wu , W. , and Jing , B. A Novel Group Decision Making Method for Airport Operational Risk Management Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 17 2020 2402 2417 https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2020130
  18. Rezaee , M. and Yousefi , S. An Intelligent Decision Making Approach for Identifying and Analyzing Airport Risks Journal of Air Transport Management 68 2017 14 27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.013
  19. Li , S. and Fan , L. Grey Relative Evaluation of Airport Apron Safety Risk Based on THEIL Index International Journal of Security and Its Applications 10 2016 1 10 https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2016.10.7.01
  20. Chang , Y. , Shao , P. , and Chen , H. Performance Evaluation of Airport Safety Management Systems in Taiwan Safety Science 75 2015 72 86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.006
  21. Pacheco , R. , Fernandes , E. , and Domingos , E. Airport Airside Safety Index Journal of Air Transport Management 34 2014 86 92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.08.007
  22. Wilke , S. , Majumdar , A. , and Ochieng , W. Airport Surface Operations: A Holistic Framework for Operations Modeling and Risk Management Safety Science 63 2014 18 33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.015
  23. Feng , C. and Chung , C. Assessing the Risks of Airport Airside through the Fuzzy Logic-Based Failure Modes, Effect, and Criticality Analysis Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013 2013 1 11 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/239523
  24. Xianfeng , L. and Shengguo , H. Airport Safety Risk Evaluation Based on Modification of Quantitative Safety Management Model Procedia Engineering 43 2012 238 244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.041
  25. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment 1st ed. Washington, DC The National Academies Press 1994 672 https://doi.org/10.17226/2125
  26. Viappiani , P. , Zilles , S. , Hamilton , H. , and Boutilier , C. Learning Complex Concepts Using Crowdsourcing: A Bayesian Approach International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory Piscataway, NJ 2011 277 291 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3-21
  27. Diedenhofen , B. and Musch , J. Option Weights Should Be Determined Empirically and Not by Experts When Assessing Knowledge with Multiple-Choice Items International Journal of Selection and Assessment 27 3 2019 256 266 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12252
  28. Bergman , M. , Drasgow , F. , Donovan , M. , Henning , J. et al. Scoring Situational Judgment Tests: Once You Get the Data, Your Troubles Begin International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14 3 2006 223 235 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00345.x
  29. Rocca , F. 2002
  30. Morgan , K. , Dekay , M. , Fischbeck , P. , Morgan , M. et al. A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (II): Evaluation of Validity and Agreement among Risk Managers Risk Analysis 21 5 2001 923 937 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215162
  31. Renn , O. The Role of Risk Perception for Risk Management Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 1998 49 62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00119-1
  32. Okrent , D. and Pidgeon , N. Risk Perception versus Risk Analysis Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 1 1998 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00345-1
  33. Xue , M. , Fu , C. , and Yang , S. Group Consensus Reaching Based on a Combination of Expert Weight and Expert Reliability Applied Mathematics and Computation 369 2020 124902 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124902
  34. Höppner , S. , Stripling , E. , Baesens , B. , Broucke , S. et al. Profit Driven Decision Trees for Churn Prediction European Journal of Operational Research 284 3 2020 920 933 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.072
  35. Heising , S. and Moyle , S. Using Model Trees to Characterize Computer Resource Usage WOSS ’04: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT Workshop on Self-Managed Systems Newport Beach, CA 2004 80 84 https://doi.org/10.1145/1075405.1075421
  36. Quaresma , V. Aprendendo a entrevistar: como fazer entrevistas em Ciências Sociais Revista Eletrônica dos Pós-Graduandos em Sociologia Política da UFSC 2 1(3) 2005 68 80 https://doi.org/10.5007/18027
  37. Johnson , B. Risk Comparisons, Conflict, and Risk Acceptability Claims Risk Analysis 24 1 2004 131 145 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00417.x
  38. Bauer , M. and Gaskell , G. Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som 13ª ed. Petrópolis, RJ Vozes 2015 520 978-8532627278
  39. Lakatos , E. and Marconi , M. Metodologia do trabalho científico 4a São Paulo Atlas 1992 85-224-3397-6
  40. Florig , H. , Morgan , M. , Morgan , K. , Jenni , K. et al. A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (I): Overview and Test Bed Development Risk Analysis 21 5 2001 913 921
  41. Ensslin , L. , Ensslin , S.R. , Marafond , A.D. , and Medaglia , T.A. Modelo multicritério de apoio à decisão construtivista no processo de avaliação de fornecedores Revista Produção 23 2 2013 402 421 https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v16i1.1885
  42. St-Sauveur , C. , Girouard , S. , and Goyette , V. Use of Situational Judgment Tests in Personnel Selection: Are the Different Methods for Scoring the Response Options Equivalent? International Journal of Selection and Assessment 22 3 2014 225 239 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12072
  43. Airport Cooperative Research Program Report 131—A Guidebook for Safety Risk Management for Airports Washington, DC Transportation Research Board 2015 212
  44. Federal Aviation Agency 2014 73
  45. International Civil Aviation Organization 2019 144
  46. Esmaeili , B. , Hallowell , M. , and Rajagopalan , B. Attribute-Based Safety Risk Assessment. II: Predicting Safety Outcomes Using Generalized Linear Models Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 141 8 2015 1 11 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000981
  47. Garner , T. and Gould , L. Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology Risk Analysis 9 2 1989 225 242 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01243.x
  48. Kirkland , I. , Caves , R. , and Humphreys , I. An Improved Methodology for Assessing Risk in Aircraft Operations at Airports, Applied to Runway Overruns Safety Science 42 2004 891 905 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2004.04.002
  49. Canale , S. , Distefano , N. , and Leonardi , S. A Risk Assessment Procedure for the Safety Management of Airport Infrastructures Proceedings at III International Congress of Società Italiana Infrastrutture Viarie, SIIV Verona, Italy 2005
  50. Wong , D. , Pitfield , D. , Caves , R. , and Appleyard , A. The Development of a More Risk-Sensitive and Flexible Airport Safety Area Strategy: Part I. The Development of an Improved Accident Frequency Model Safety Science 47 2009 903 912 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.010
  51. Wong , D. , Pitfield , D. , Caves , R. , and Appleyard , A. The Development of a More Risk-Sensitive and Flexible Airport Safety Area Strategy: Part II. Accident Location Analysis and Airport Risk Assessment Case Studies Safety Science 47 2009 913 924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.011
  52. Ayres , M. , Shiorazi , H. , Caravalo , R. , Hall , J. et al. Modelling the Location and Consequences of Aircraft Accidents Safety Science 51 1 2013 178 186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.012
  53. Di Mascio , P. and Loprencipe , G. Risk Analysis in the Surrounding Areas of One-Runway Airports: A Methodology to Preliminary Calculus of PSZs Dimensions ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 11 23 2016 13641 13649
  54. Moretti , L. , Di Mascio , P. , Nichele , S. , and Cokorilo , O. Runway Veer-Off Accidents: Quantitative Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Measures Safety Science 104 2018 157 163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.010
  55. Ketbadari , M. , Giustozzi , F. , and Crispino , M. Sensitivity Analysis of Influencing Factors in Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Airports Safety Science 107 2018 173 187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.005
  56. Slovic , P. and Peters , E. Risk Perception and Affect Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 6 2006 322 325 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
  57. Neufville , R. and Odoni , A. Airport Systems—Planning, Design and Management 1st ed. New York McGraw-Hill 2003 883 978-0071384773
  58. Lowrance W. The Nature of Risk Schwing , R. and Albers , W. Societal Risk Assessment—How Safe Is Safe Enough? New York Plenum Press 1980 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9
  59. Kontio , J. Software Engineering Risk Management: A Method, Improvement Framework, and Empirical Evaluation Helsinki Helsinki University of Technology 2001 952-5136-22-1
  60. Fischhoff , B. , Watson , S. , and Hope , C. Defining Risk Policy Sciences 17 1984 123 139 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146924
  61. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Using 21st Century Science to Improve Risk-Related Evaluations Washington, DC The National Academies Press 2018 https://doi.org/10.17226/24635
  62. Kazda , A. and Caves , R. Airport Design and Operation 2nd ed. Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2010 522 978-0-08-045104-6
  63. Altenbach , T. A Comparison of Risk Assessment Techniques from Qualitative to Quantitative Joint American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME) Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference Honolulu, HI 1995 https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/67753
  64. Suh , B. and Han , I. The IS Risk Analysis Based on a Business Model Information and Management 41 2 2003 149 158 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00044-2
  65. Sjöberg , L. , Rundmo , T. , and Moen , B. Explaining Risk Perception: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Paradigm in Risk Perception Research 1st ed. Rotunde 2004 33
  66. Fischhoff , B. , Slovic , P. , Lichtenstein , S. , Read , S. et al. How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits Politic Sciences 9 1978 127 152
  67. Slovic , P. Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm Goldwing , D. and Krinsky , S. Social Theories of Risk Westport, CT Praeger 1992 117 152
  68. Bernstein , P. Desafio aos deuses. A fascinante história do risco 3ª Rio de Janeiro Campus 1997 978-8550802732
  69. Nardocci , A. 2000
  70. Slovic , P. Perception of Risk Science 236 4799 1987 280 285
  71. Brown , B. Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinions of Experts California: The RAND Corporation 1968 15
  72. Wolff , K. , Larsen , S. , and Øgaard , T. How to Define and Measure Risk Perceptions Annals of Tourism Research 79 2019 102759 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102759
  73. Starr , C. Social Benefit versus Technological Risk Science 165 3899 1969 1232 1238
  74. Slovic , P. , Fischhoff , B. , and Lichtenstein , S. Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk Schwing , R. and Albers , W. Societal Risk Assessment—How Safe Is Safe Enough? New York Plenum Press 1980 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9
  75. Slovic , P. Perception of Risk from Radiation Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68 3 1996 165 180 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031860
  76. Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Science 185 4157 1974 1124 1131
  77. Hoegberg , L. Risk Perception, Safety Goals and Regulatory Decision-Making Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 1998 135 139 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00134-8
  78. Cohen , B. Public Perception versus Results of Scientific Risk Analysis Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59 1998 101 105 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00130-0
  79. Rohrmann , B. and Renn , O. Risk Perception Research Cross-Cultural Risk Perception 20 2000 11 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8
  80. Langer , E. The Illusion of Control Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 2 1975 311 328 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
  81. Lopes , L. Some Thoughts on the Psychological Concept of Risk Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 1 1983 137 144 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.9.1.137
  82. Tversky , A. and Kahneman , D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice Science 211 4481 1981 453 458
  83. Sjöberg , L. Risk Perception by the Public and by Experts: A Dilemma in Risk Management Human Ecology Review 6 2 1999 1 9
  84. Mckenna , F. It Won’t Happen to Me: Unrealistic Optimism or Illusion of Control? British Journal of Psychology 84 1993 39 50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02461.x
  85. Weinstein , N. Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 5 1980 806 820 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
  86. Price , P.
  87. Ronzani , P. , Savadori , L. , Folloni , G. , and Mittone , L. Selective Insensitivity for Losses but Not Gains in Decision Making under Risk among the Poor Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 77 2018 96 106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.10.001
  88. Robinson , P. and Botzen , W. Determinants of Probability Neglect and Risk Attitudes for Disaster Risk: An Online Experimental Study of Flood Insurance Demand among Homeowners Risk Analysis 39 11 2019 2514 2527 https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13361
  89. Gaissmaier , W. and Gigerenzer , G. 9/11, Act II: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Regional Variations in Traffic Fatalities in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attacks Psychological Science 23 12 2012 1449 1454 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447804
  90. Wilde , G. The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health Risk Analysis 2 4 1982 209 225 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01384.x
  91. Xia , N. , Wang , X. , Griffin , M. , Wu , C. et al. Do We See How They Perceive Risk? An Integrated Analysis of Risk Perception and Its Effect on Workplace Safety Behavior Accident Analysis and Prevention 106 2017 234 242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.010
  92. Slovic , P. The Psychology of Risk Saúde e Sociedade 19 4 2010 731 747 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902010000400002
  93. Robson , S. , Searston , R. , Edmund , G. , Mccarthy , D. et al. An Expert-Novice Comparison of Feature Choice Applied Cognitive Psychology 1 2020 1 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3676
  94. Torbaghan , M. , Burrow , M. , Hunt , D. , and Elcheikh , M. Risk-Based Framework (RBF) for a UK Pan-European Supergrid Energy 124 2017 124 132 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.058
  95. Knetsch , J. Assumptions, Behavioral Findings, and Policy Analysis Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14 1 1995 68 78 https://doi.org/10.2307/3325433
  96. Gowda , M. Heuristics, Biases, and the Regulation of Risk Policy Sciences 32 1999 59 78 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004340726008
  97. Sackman , H. Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting and Group Process Santa Monica, CA RAND 1974
  98. Cho , E. and Kim , S. Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood Organizational Research Methods 18 2 2015 207 230 https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Modeling Study of the Battery Pack for the Electric Conversion of a Commercial Vehicle
Research Report Unsettled Issues Concerning the Use of Fuel Cells in Electric Ground Vehicles
Technical Paper Risk Analysis for Monitoring and Diagnosis of Problems in the Automotive Industry