This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Case Study of Water Condensation and Evaporation Effects on Tailpipe Continuous Mass Emission Calculations in a Gasoline Powertrain
Journal Article
03-16-04-0029
ISSN: 1946-3936, e-ISSN: 1946-3944
Sector:
Topic:
Citation:
Kempema, N., Lown, A., Kralik, L., and Loos, M., "Case Study of Water Condensation and Evaporation Effects on Tailpipe Continuous Mass Emission Calculations in a Gasoline Powertrain," SAE Int. J. Engines 16(4):505-513, 2023, https://doi.org/10.4271/03-16-04-0029.
Language:
English
Abstract:
Emissions development work for gasoline aftertreatment systems is often conducted
in a laboratory on a chassis dynamometer. In this situation, extractive sample
lines are frequently connected to the aftertreatment system before and after
various components, such as a three-way catalyst, selective catalytic reduction
substrate, and the like. This is done to measure the conversion efficiency of
the aftertreatment system components as a function of time. The time series
exhaust component concentration data, also referred to as continuous data, are
combined with a measure of exhaust volumetric flowrate and used to calculate
mass-based emissions. As gasoline powertrains become cleaner and produce lower
levels of criteria emissions, the proximity (i.e., colocated or not colocated)
of the volumetric flowrate and concentration measurements may affect the
accuracy of the overall mass emission calculation. In this work, we investigate
the effect of water condensation and evaporation on continuous mass emission
calculations in a gasoline powertrain. A dual-pitot tube flowmeter system is
implemented to measure differences in volumetric flowrate between two tailpipe
locations in the same vehicle. It was found that carbon monoxide, ammonia, and
formaldehyde are especially susceptible to impacts from water condensation and
evaporation effects due to the timing of their emission within a drive cycle
and/or their water solubility. The mass emission of ammonia in the case study
vehicle, for example, was underpredicted by up to ~15% if the tailpipe
measurements of its concentration and the exhaust gas volumetric flowrate were
not colocated.