This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Can Road Transport Informatics Help Vulnerable Road Users?
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Road Transport Informatics (RTI) systems for improving the vehicular traffic situation are often aimed at increasing capacities and reducing travel times on urban roads. Such measures may well have severe disbenefits for vulnerable road users in that they are likely to increase vehicle speeds. A small increase in average vehicle speed would result in quite large increases in fatalities and injuries to vulnerable road users. It would also have the effect of making walking and cycling more difficult - for example pedestrians would face increased crossing delays.
There remains the alternative of designing RTI systems specifically to enhance the mobility and safety of vulnerable road users. Yet even here there are a number of difficulties. In particular, it is difficult to conceive of applying systems to confront the problem directly, e.g by equipping cars with vulnerable road user (VRU) detection devices or to equip VRUs with devices that provide advice in difficult situations. The in-car devices have the problem of predicting VRU behaviour (for example, when a pedestrian standing at the kerbs actually going to cross) and the VRU-carried devices are unlikely to be used on a wide scale in the foreseeable future. It therefore seems more fruitful to use RTI in a more indirect manner to enhance VRU safety and mobility.
Authors
Citation
Carsten, O., "Can Road Transport Informatics Help Vulnerable Road Users?," SAE Technical Paper 912855, 1991, https://doi.org/10.4271/912855.Also In
References
- UNITED NATIONS Statistics of Road Traffic Accidents in Europe 25 1988 New York 1990
- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT Road Accidents Great Britain 1989: The Casualty Report London HMSO 1990
- TIGHT M.R. CARSTEN O.M.J. Problems for vulnerable road users in Great Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds 1989
- MORGAN J.M. Cycling in safety? Safety 91, Transport and Road Research Laboratory 1991
- HASS-KLAU C. The theory and practice of traffic calming: can Britain learn from the German experience? Brighton Environment and Transport Planning 1990
- ASHTON S.J. Vehicle design and pedestrian injuries Chapman, A.J. Wade, F.M. Foot, H.C. Pedestrian Accidents Chichester John Wiley & Sons 1982
- DRASKOCZY M. HYDEN C. Safety objectives for cyclists and pedestrians DRIVE Project V1062: Multilayered Safety Objectives. Bulletin 96 Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund 1991
- DAVIES H.E.H. WINNETT M.A. FARMER S.A. Pedestrian safety Safety 91, Transport and Road Research Laboratory 1991
- HALL R.D. Accidents at four-arm single carriageway urban traffic signals CR65, Transport and Road Research Laboratory 1986
- JAVID M. SENEVIRATNE P.N. Expected conflicts: a measure of pedestrian safety in CBDs Transportation Research Board 70th annual meeting 1991
- BRUNDELL-FREIJ K. EKMAN L. Flow and safety: some aspects on the relationship with special respect to unprotected road users Transportation Research Board 70th annual meeting 1991
- FONTAINE H. MALATERRE G. Safety evaluation of PROMETHEUS functions PRO-GEN workshop November 28 29 1990
- ARMSBY P. An ‘intelligent pedestrian device’ (IPD) to assist in crossing the road: some initial thoughts Universities Transport Study Group annual conference 1988
- DRIVE SAFETY TASK FORCE Guidelines on system safety, man-machine interaction and traffic safety Brussels DRIVE Central Office 1991
- CARSTEN O.M.J. TIGHT M.R. SOUTHWELL M.T. Urban accidents: why do they happen? Basingstoke AA Foundation for Road Safety Research 1990
- SHERBORNE D.J. VAN SCHAGEN I.N.L.G. EKMAN L. Microwave detection of vulnerable road users: three feasibility trials carried out at traffic signal locations Draft report, DRIVE project V1031 1991