This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Diesel and Natural Gas Bus Performance
Technical Paper
2014-01-2432
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Over the years, natural gas has been promoted as a clean-burning fuel, especially for transit buses. A decade ago one could claim that natural gas buses deliver significant emission benefits over diesel buses, especially regarding particulate emissions. The spread in nitrogen oxide emissions has always been significant for natural gas engines, high for lean-burn engines and low for three-way catalyst equipped stoichiometric engines.
With the introduction of US 2010 and Euro VI (effective as of 2014) exhaust emission regulations, independent of the fuel, the regulated emissions of all engines have been brought close to zero level. This means that the advantage of natural gas as a clean fuel is diminishing, especially in a situation in which electric transit buses are also entering the market.
The motivation to use natural gas could still be diesel fuel substitution and to some extent, also reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. However, looking at the full fuel cycle and also taking into account methane leakages in various part of the fuel cycle, natural gas is, at its best, comparable to diesel regarding greenhouse gas emissions, not better. One of the reasons for this is the low fuel efficiency of spark-ignited gas engines compared to diesel engines. To deliver an advantage regarding greenhouse gas emissions, the efficiency of the gas engines should be significantly improved. Alternatively natural gas should be replaced with biogas.
The paper presents a comparison of diesel and natural gas buses for regulated emissions, selected unregulated emission components, greenhouse gas emissions and energy efficiency.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Nylund, N., Karvonen, V., Kuutti, H., and Laurikko, J., "Comparison of Diesel and Natural Gas Bus Performance," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2432, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2432.Also In
References
- IEA-Advanced Motor Fuels. Annual Report 2011 2012 http://www.ieaamf.org/app/webroot/files/file/Annual%20Reports/Annual%20Report%202011%20Final_.pdf
- Transport, Energy and CO2. Moving Toward Sustainability 2009 International Energy Agency Paris 2009
- Well-to-Tank Appendix 1 - Version 4.0. Conversion factors and fuel properties 2014 JRC Technical Reports. http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/about-jec/downloads
- Nylund , N.-O. & Koponen , K. 2012 Fuel and technology options for buses Overall energy efficiency and emission performance. Espoo 2012. VTT Technology 46 294 http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/technology/2012/T46.pdf
- VTT's database on transit bus emissions 2011 http://www.transeco.fi/files/556/Kaupunkibussien_paastotietokanta_2011_Yhteenveto_VTTn_menetelmista_ja_mittauksista.pdf
- Nylund , Nils-Olof , Erkkilä , Kimmo , Lappi , Maija , Ikonen , Markku 2004 Transit bus emission study: Comparison of emissions from diesel and natural gas buses Research report: PRO3/P5150/04. VTT Processes October 2004 63 http://www.vtt.fi/inf/julkaisut/muut/2004/TransitBusEmission.pdf
- Maron , D.M. & Ames , B.N. 1983 Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test Mutation Res. 113 1983 173 215
- Nylund , Nils-Olof , Erkkilä , Kimmo , Clark , Nigel & Rideout , Greg 2007 Evaluation of duty cycles for heavy-duty urban vehicles Final report of IEA AMF Annex XXIX. VTT Research notes 2396. VTT March 2007 82 http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2007/T2396.pdf
- DieselNet Emission Test Cycles https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/
- Koponen , K. & Nylund , N.-O. 2012 IEA Technology Network Cooperation: Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emissions SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1981 25