This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Uncertainty of CRASH3 ΔV and Energy Loss for Frontal Collisions
Technical Paper
2012-01-0608
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This research investigates the uncertainty in the calculation of the change in velocity, ΔV, and the crush energy, EC, due to variations in the computed values of crush stiffness coefficients, A and B (d₀ and d₁), and due to variations in the measurements of the residual crush, Ci, i = 1,...6, using the CRASH3 damage algorithm. An understanding of the nature of such uncertainties is of particular importance as both the ΔV and EC are frequently used as inputs to reconstruction methods and become variations in the reconstruction process. These variations lead to uncertainties in the results of the reconstruction which are generally the preimpact speed of one or both of the vehicles involved in the collision. This paper consists of three parts. The first investigates the uncertainty associated with the calculation of the stiffness coefficients A and B (d₀ and d₁). The second part looks at the uncertainty of the CRASH3 process of calculating the velocity change, ΔV, of both vehicles and the energy loss, EC, of the system. The third part examines the effect of such variations on the reconstruction of vehicle speeds in frontal collisions.
The magnitudes of the uncertainty of the manual measurements of residual crush values Ci, i = 1,...6, are determined from results presented in the literature. The uncertainty of the stiffness coefficients, A and B (d₀ and d₁), were determined by accessing six different light vehicle models for which experimental data from multiple NHTSA frontal barrier tests was available. The stiffness coefficients were computed for each set of test data for each vehicle model. These values, with a minimum of six frontal barrier tests per vehicle, give an average and standard deviation for each coefficient for each vehicle model. These values then provide the variation of the stiffness coefficients for these vehicle models. These variations then are used in the CRASH3 damage algorithm, through the use of Monte Carlo analysis, to calculate the uncertainty in the ΔV and EC for each of the six vehicle models colliding with a fixed, rigid barrier. Comparison of the results of the analyses shows that the uncertainty in ΔV and EC due to the experimentally determined stiffness coefficients is considerably more significant than the uncertainty due to the variation in the measurements of the residual crush.
The paper then examines the use of these results in the reconstruction of two in-line collisions. Here the uncertainties in ΔV and EC become variations in the reconstruction process. The results of this section present a range of values for the preimpact speed of one of the crash vehicles based on the range of values for the crush energy loss determined in the first part of the paper.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Brach, R., Brach, R., and Louderback, A., "Uncertainty of CRASH3 ΔV and Energy Loss for Frontal Collisions," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0608, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0608.Also In
References
- NHTSA, CRASH3 Technical Manual, US Department of Transportation 1986 http://www-nass.nhtsa.dot.gov/NASS/MANUALS/Crash3Man.pdf
- Campbell, K. “Energy Basis for Collision Severity,” SAE Technical Paper 740565 1974 10.4271/740565
- Strother, C. Woolley, R. James, M. “A Comparison Between NHTSA Crash Test Data and CRASH3 Frontal Stiffness Coefficients,” SAE Technical Paper 900101 1990 10.4271/900101
- Prasad, A. “CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions,” SAE Technical Paper 900098 1990 10.4271/900098
- Neptune, J. Flynn, J. Underwood, H. Chavez, P. “Impact Analysis Based Upon the CRASH3 Damage Algorithm,” SAE Technical Paper 950358 1995 10.4271/950358
- m-Crash, McHenry Software, Inc., Cary, NC http://www.mchenrysoftware.com/mcrash.htm
- EDCRASH, Engineering Dynamics Corporation, Beaverton, OR http://www.edccorp.com/products/edcrash3.html
- WinCRASH, AR Software by Trantech, Edmonds, WA http://www.arsoftware.com/sw.htm
- Crush, Rec-Tec, Rockledge, FL http://www.rec-tec.com/Manual-PDF/RTCRS.pdf
- VCRware Brach Engineering, LLC Granger, IN http://www.brachengineering.com/about_vcrware.htm
- Varat, M. Husher, S. Kerkhoff, J. “An Analysis of Trends of Vehicle Frontal Impact Stiffness,” SAE Technical Paper 940914 1994 10.4271/940914
- Woolley, R. “Non-Linear Damage Analysis in Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0504 2001 10.4271/2001-01-0504
- Singh, J. “The Effect of Residual Damage Interpolation Mesh Fineness on Calculated Side Impact Stiffness Coefficients,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1205 2005 10.4271/2005-01-1205
- Smith, R. Noga, J. “Accuracy and Sensitivity of CRASH,” SAE Technical Paper 821169 1982 10.4271/821169
- Woolley, R. Warner, C. Tagg, M. “Inaccuracies in the CRASHS Program,” SAE Technical Paper 850255 1985 10.4271/850255
- Strother, C. Woolley, R. James, M. Warner, C. “Crush Energy in Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 860371 1986 10.4271/860371
- Brach, R. Brach, R. “Crush Energy and Planar Impact Mechanics for Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 980025 1998 10.4271/980025
- Brach, R. Welsh, K. Brach, R. “Residual Crush Energy Partitioning, Normal and Tangential Energy Losses,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0737 2007 10.4271/2007-01-0737
- Randles, B. Jones, B. Welcher, J. Szabo, T. et al. “The Accuracy of Photogrammetry vs. Hands-on Measurement Techniques used in Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0065 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0065
- Fenton, S. Johnson, W. LaRocque, J. Rose, N. et al. “Using Digital Photogrammetry to Determine Vehicle Crush and Equivalent Barrier Speed (EBS),” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0439 1999 10.4271/1999-01-0439
- O'Shields, L. Kress, T. Hungerford, J. Aikens, C. “Determination and Verification of Equivalent Barrier Speeds (EBS) Using PhotoModeler as a Measurement Tool,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1208 2004 10.4271/2004-01-1208
- Tumbas, N. Smith, R. “Measuring Protocol for Quantifying Vehicle Damage from an Energy Basis Point of View,” SAE Technical Paper 880072 1988 10.4271/880072
- Prasad, A. “Energy Absorbed by Vehicle Structures in Side-Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 910599 1991 10.4271/910599
- Prasad, A. “Energy Absorbing Properties of Vehicle Structures and Their Use in Estimating Impact Severity in Automobile Collision,” SAE Technical Paper 925209 1992
- NHTSA Vehicle Crash Test Database http://www.nhtsa.gov/Research/Databases+and+Software
- Smith, R. A. Noga, J. T. “Accuracy and Sensitivity of CRASH,” Technical Report DOT-HS-806-152 January 1982
- RiskAMP Monte Carlo Simulation Engine, Structured Data LLC www.riskamp.com
- Fleck, G. Daily, J. “Sensitivity of Monte Carlo Modeling in Crash Reconstruction,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 3 1 100 112 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0071
- Brach, R.M. Brach, M. “Vehicle Accident Analysis and Reconstruction Methods, Second Edition,” SAE International Warrendale, PA 978-0-7680-3437-0 2011 10.4271/R-397
- Brach, R. “The Use of EDR Data in Vehicle Accident Reconstructions” Collision Magazine 6 2 Fall 2011
- Brach, R. Welsh, K. Brach, R. “Residual Crush Energy Partitioning, Normal and Tangential Energy Losses,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0737 2007 10.4271/2007-01-0737
- Bartlett, W. Wright, W. Masory, O. Brach, R. et al. “Evaluating the Uncertainty in Various Measurement Tasks Common to Accident Reconstruction,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0546 2002 10.4271/2002-01-0546