This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Hole Making Processes and Surface Conditioning on Fatigue Behavior of 6061-T6 Aluminum
Technical Paper
2000-01-0783
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
SAE 2000 World Congress
Language:
English
Abstract
In order to reduce the cost of manufacturing aluminum structures, the automotive and earth moving industries are looking at lasers, high speed machining, and plasma processes to cut holes and various shapes. Tower Automotive in conjunction with Caterpillar as part of a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) funded program, studied the effects of various hole-making processes on the fatigue life of 6061-T6 aluminum. Another part of this program was to study the effects of various surface treatment procedures to increase the fatigue life by a factor of ten or higher.
SAE keyhole specimens were made from 3mm and 6mm thick 6061-T6 aluminum. The center test hole was cut using punch pierce, O2 plasma, 4KW CO2 laser, 3KW YAG laser, and HyDefinition plasma. The fatigue testing indicated punch pierce cut holes had the highest fatigue life, while at almost all stress (load) levels, holes cut with CO2 laser had the lowest fatigue life. Surface roughness analysis agreed in general with this finding.
In the second phase of this program, the SAE keyhole specimens were made from 6mm thick 6061-T6. The center test hole was cut using punch pierce and 4KW CO2 laser. These two processes were selected to (1) determine whether the hole conditioning will provide greater improvement in CO2 cut specimens compared to punch pierce cut, and (2) obtain the range of improvement possible. The center test hole in these specimens was treated with traditional shot peening, strain shot peening, laser shot (shock) peening, flow drill, abrasive flow machining, and hole expansion with and without reaming. Fatigue data indicated that the hole-expansion with or without reaming improved the fatigue life by a factor much greater than ten. Laser shot peening improved fatigue life by a factor greater than 7. All other methods provided marginal improvement.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Thakkar, R., Shah, R., and Vanark, V., "Effects of Hole Making Processes and Surface Conditioning on Fatigue Behavior of 6061-T6 Aluminum," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0783, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-0783.Also In
References
- Hilbelink Dan “RMS Surface Roughness Measurements of Holes in Aluminum and Steel Plates” Rexnord Technical Services Report No. 98-0554-01 Tower Automotive Milwaukee, WI
- Wilhelm Glen “Microhardness Evaluation-6061 T6 and Low carbon Steel Samples” Tower Automotive Manufacturing Process Laboratory Internal Report No. MPL-98164
- Rice Richard C. “SAE Fatigue Design Handbook” Third Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1997
- Bannantine Julie a. Comer Jess J. Handrock James L. “Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis” Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey 1990
- Fuchs H. O. Stephens R. I. “Metal fatigue in Engineering” Wiley-Interscience New York 1980
- Rhoades Lawrence J. Gilmore J. Randall Yamaguchi Hitomi “Abrasive Flow-Related Processes” Extrude Hone Corporation Irwin, PA
- User Guide, Flow Drill Handler Tool Sales Inc. Northbrook, IL
- Private Communication-Ken Eaton Fatigue Technology Inc. Seattle, WA
- Breuer David “Technical Aspects of Shot Peening-Notes” Metal Improvement Co. Inc. Milwaukee, WI
- Harris Fritz B. “Lasershot SM Peening Program” Metal Improvement Co. Inc. Rocklin, CA