Safety (64)Aircraft (5)Human factors (5)Commercial aircraft (4)Accident reconstruction (3)Crash research (3)Design processes (3)Liability (3)Passenger compartments (3)Chassis (2)Communication systems (2)Crashes (2)Disaster and emergency management (2)Reaction and response times (2)Research and development (2)Air traffic control (1)Aircraft instruments (1)Aircraft operations (1)Aircraft structures (1)Automation (1)Avionics (1)Batteries (1)Biomaterials (1)Body structures (1)Children (1)Comfort (1)Cost analysis (1)Crashworthiness (1)Data acquisition and handling (1)Data management (1)Design Engineering and Styling (1)Documentation (1)Driver assistance systems (1)Driver behavior (1)Education and training (1)Electronic equipment (1)Fatal injuries (1)Fire (1)Fire prevention (1)Fittings (1)Fixed-wing aircraft (1)Globalization (1)Ground support (1)Ground vehicle operations (1)Hazardous materials (1)Human machine interface (HMI) (1)Hydraulic fluids (1)Hydraulic systems (1)Impact tests (1)Injuries (1)
Clavel, Maurice (2)Engelbrecht, Per-Ove (2)Mitman, Robert (2)Neumeier, Mark (2)Rehmann, Albert (2)Reynolds, Michael (2)Serizawa, Yoshio (2)Barnes, Jr., Frank E. (1)Barnes, Valerie E. (1)Bisson, Tony (1)Bohers, Serge (1)Braess, Hans Hermann (1)Brandt, Mads H. (1)Cesari, Dominique (1)Chou, Clifford C. (1)Deb, Anindya (1)Dutta, Utpal (1)Edwards, John A. (1)Ekberg, Gustav (1)Evans, Leonard (1)Fischer , Thomas (1)Fischer, Christian (1)Freitas, M. D. (1)Friedel, Bernd (1)Goshi, Kazuaki (1)Grossman, David L. (1)Gunti, Srinivas (1)Hayano, Hiroshi (1)Hayashi, Masaki (1)Holt, Daniel J. (1)Huelke, D. F. (1)Hull, Tina (1)Italian, Delegation (1)Jaksch, Friedrich (1)Kawano, Jiro (1)Konishi, Kenkichi (1)Kuiperbak, Johan G. (1)Maeda, Teruo (1)Margara, M. (1)Marker, Jesse L. (1)Matsunaga, Katsuya (1)Mcinnis, R. J. (1)McKibben, Jon S. (1)Monan, William P. (1)Muhlrad, N. (1)Nakagawa, Ryoich (1)Passmore, Jim (1)Perring, Hubert (1)Peters, Barbara J. (1)Peters, George A. (1)
Anonymous Society of Citroen Automobiles (3)British Airways (2)Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center (CSERIAC) (2)European Commission (2)Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center (2)Nissan Motor Co. (2)1971 ESV Delegation (1)Airplane Div., Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Co., Inc., Garden (1)American Association for Automotive medicine (1)Automotive Research Div., Digitek Corp. (1)Battelle Human Affairs Research Center (1)Battelle's Aviation Safety Reporting System Office (1)BMW of North America LLC (1)Britannia Airways Ltd. (1)Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG (1)Delphi Delco Electronics Europe GmbH (1)ESV Project, Honda Motor Co. (1)Federal Highway Administration (1)Federal Ministry of Transport (1)Fiat (1)Handling and Stability, AB Volvo (1)Indian Institute of Science (1)Indian Institute Of Science (1)International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations (1)Kyushu Sangyo Univ. (1)Medical Tribune (1)Ministry of Transport (1)Ministry of Transport, Road Transport Services (1)Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (1)Omron Corp. (1)Organisme National de la Secruite Routiere (1)Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (1)Peters & Peters (1)ProBiomechanics LLC (1)Research and Development, NHTSA, U.S. Dept. of Transportatio (1)Science Serving Society (1)Teledyne Controls (1)Toyota Motor Co., Ltd. (1)United Airlines Seattle, WA (1)Univ. of Detroit Mercy (1)University of Michigan (1)University of Wuppertal (1)Vehicle Dept., Swedish Road Traffic Safety Office (1)Washington Office, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Associatio (1)Wayne State University (1)Witech Engineering GmbH (1)
AGE-3 Aircraft Ground Support Equipment Committee (1)G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies (1)G10-OL Operational Laser Committee (1)S-9A Safety Equipment and Survival Systems Committee (1)S-9C Operational and Human Factors Issues Committee (1)
International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (21)American Association for Automotive Medicine, Annual Meeting (4)Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition (3)1972 Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition (1)34th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (1)Flight Safety~A Total Commitment (1)Global Analysis and Information Network (1)Human Factors for Aerospace Leaders (1)International Automobile Safety Conference (1)JAR 145: The Wootton Report and Beyond (1)JSAE Spring Conference (1)SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition (1)SAE 2012 World Congress & Exhibition (1)Safety in Airlines~The Management Commitment (1)Sixth Stapp Car Crash Conference (1)Tires~Chassis~Roadway (1)WCX World Congress Experience (1)
Published 2018-09-19 by SAE International in United States
The tow vehicle should be designed for towbarless movement of aircraft on the ground.The design will ensure that the unit will safely secure the aircraft nose landing gear within the coupling system for any operational mode.
S-9A Safety Equipment and Survival Systems Committee
Published 2018-06-11 by SAE International in United States
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) identifies the risks and dangers associated with the carriage and use of pyrotechnic signaling devices in transport category aircraft life rafts and slide/rafts, and provides a rationale for allowing the use of alternative non-pyrotechnic devices authorized by FAA/TSO-C168. These devices offer an equivalent level of safety while eliminating flight safety risks, enhancing survivability of aircraft ditching survivors, reducing costs, eliminating dangerous goods transportation and handling issues, and reducing environmental impact of dangerous goods disposal.
Published 2018-06-02 by SAE International in United States
This document is intended to give guidance to users, regulators and persons in the aviation field who may be affected by the potential visual interference effects of lasers aimed at aircraft by the general public. The potential effects include startle (distraction, disruption, disorientation, and operational incapacitation), glare, and flashblindness. This document provides mitigation strategies against such effects, including operational procedures, pilot education, and the use of Laser Glare Protection.
Published 2018-04-03 by SAE International in United States
A well-designed safety system has seamlessly integrated measures that accommodates user needs and makes their tasks easier to perform. Current safety solutions are not adequate when technology and generational trends consistently evolve. However, understanding the factors that drove past development leads to the implementation of relevant future designs.
Although many have an idea of what the term “driver distraction” means, there is no common definition within the research community. Additionally, there are many studies that have investigated the topic, but with varying and sometimes conflicting results. What should be made of these discrepancies? This four-hour web seminar will provide an overview of driver distraction (predominantly electronic devices): the problem; how to define it; the current state of research and how to critically evaluate that research to make informed decisions; and the effectiveness of state laws and fleet policies to reduce it. The conclusion of the course will summarize strategies, techniques, and technologies that have been shown to be effective in reducing distracted driving from electronic devices. This course has been approved by the Accreditation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction (ACTAR) for 4 Continuing Education Units (CEUs). Upon completion of this seminar, accredited reconstructionists should mail a copy of their course certificate and the $5 student CEU fee to ACTAR, PO Box 1493, North Platte, NE 69103. This course also satisfies a requirement in…
Published 2012-04-16 by SAE International in United States
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) is of great significance in the lean design of vehicles. The present work is concerned with the objective of cross-functional optimization (i.e. MDO) of automotive body. For simplicity, the main goal adopted here is minimizing the weight of the body meeting NVH and crash safety targets. The stated goal can be achieved following either of two different ways: classic response surface method (RSM) and practical MDO methodology espoused recently. Even though RSM seems to be able to find a design point which satisfies the constraints, the problem is with the time associated with running such CAE algorithms that can provide a single optimal solution for multi-disciplinary areas such as NVH and crash safety. The present work compares the results of both the methods for a real-world vehicle and concludes that the current practical MDO methodology is substantially more efficient when compared to RSM-based optimization and predicts nearly the same solution as the latter.
Aircraft accident and incident investigations should be supported by all engineering disciplines and departments involved with design, manufacturing, certification, and field operations. For individuals called upon to serve as advisors or technical representatives to official aircraft accident investigation (AAI) teams, an understanding of accident and wreckage reconstruction methodologies and processes is critical to success in this supportive role. This two-day seminar will begin with basic investigative philosophies and procedures. The instructor will then guide participants through various basic data gathering methods that cover specific types of accident investigations, which include human factors, crashworthiness, fire and explosions, in-flight breakups, and mid-air collisions. Presentations are based on actual accidents and real-life investigation experiences and AAI case studies are integrated throughout the course to provide participants the knowledge required to effectively support aircraft accident and wreckage reconstruction. By attending this seminar, you will be able to: Identify the key requirements and steps in the AAI process.Identify and evaluate analytical procedures used in an AAI.Identify and analyze potential complications that arise during an AAI.Construct and contribute analysis in support…
This four-hour short course provides an introduction to contamination control principles in aircraft hydraulic systems. Topics covered include an introduction to the types of contamination in aircraft hydraulic systems, contaminant measurement, and reporting methods. In addition, the impact of contamination on hydraulic components is discussed in detail. Along with an introduction to filtration mechanisms, information on testing, rating, and specifying filters will be provided.By attending this seminar, you will be able to: Associate the types of contaminant in aircraft hydraulic systems and the problems that uncontrolled contamination can causeInterpret a particle count or contamination level reportIdentify how filters work and are evaluatedExplain filter ratingsFormulate a basic specification for hydraulic filters.5 Day .4 CEUs
Although many have an idea of what the term “driver distraction” means, there is no common definition within the research community. Additionally, there are many studies that have investigated the topic, but with varying and sometimes conflicting results. What should be made of these discrepancies? This four-hour web seminar will provide an overview of driver distraction (predominantly electronic devices): the problem; how to define it; the current state of research and how to critically evaluate that research to make informed decisions; and the effectiveness of state laws and fleet policies to reduce it. The conclusion of the course will summarize strategies, techniques, and technologies that have been shown to be effective in reducing distracted driving from electronic devices. This course has been approved by the Accreditation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction (ACTAR) for 4 Continuing Education Units (CEUs). Upon completion of this seminar, accredited reconstructionists should mail a copy of their course certificate and the $5 student CEU fee to ACTAR, PO Box 1493, North Platte, NE 69103. By connecting with this web seminar, you…
The current search and criteria have already been saved. Please modify your criteria to save as a new search.
Request Sent successfully!
Contact Technical Support
Institutional Access Sign-up
Search Tips: Search Operators:AND, OR, NOT; Wild Cards; Using Quotes
SAE MOBILUS® Search Tips
Please note: All terms not contained within quotes, will be evaluated using the OR operator. This means that your search results will contain all results that contain ANY of the entered terms.
AND, OR, NOT
SAE MOBILUS supports the use of the AND, OR and NOT BOOLEAN operators ONLY function with the Advanced Search.
Using the asterisk, ( * ) allows you to search for a partial word. For example, entering a keyword search of aero* will search for any word beginning with aero.
Using the question mark, ( ? ) allows you to search for a word with a single character wildcard. For example, searching for t?re would match both tire and tyre
Words in double quotes " " are treated as a phrase. Conducting a search for "heat model" will return all results in which the exact phrase "heat model" is found, while "heat modeling" would NOT be included.
A term combined with a phrase will be joined with an OR operator.
Searching for Standards
When searching for a standard please use the entire Document Number assigned, which includes the abbreviation. A space can be used, or omitted between the abbreviation and number.