Your Selections

TEVAQR
Show Only

Filters

Collections

File Formats

Content Types

Dates

Sectors

Topics

Publishers

Committees

Committee Codes

Design Review Based on Failure Modes (DRBFM)

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J2886_201303
  • Current
Published 2013-03-05 by SAE International in United States
SAE J2886 Design Review Based on Failure Modes (DRBFM) Recommended Practice is intended for Automotive and Non-Automotive applications. It describes the basic principles and processes of DRBFM including planning, preparation, change point FMEA, design reviews, decisions based on actions completed, and feedback loops to other processes, such as design, validation and process guidelines (Appendix B - DRBFM Process Map). The intent of each fundamental step of the DRBFM methodology is presented. It is intended for use by organizations whose product development processes currently (or intend to) use Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA) or DRBFM as a tool for assessing the potential risk and reliability of system elements (product or process) or as part of their product improvement processes. DRBFM is not intended to replace FMEA however, companies interested in adopting DRBFM will benefit from the focus on specific change points and supporting engineering decisions based on detailed discussions. DRBFM is a change in company culture that requires management commitment to changing the mind set of employees to drill deep and continually ask the question…
Datasets icon
Annotation icon

Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA), Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA)

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J1739_200901
  • Current
Published 2009-01-15 by SAE International in United States
This FMEA Standard describes Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (DFMEA) and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (PFMEA). It assists users in the identification and mitigation of risk by providing appropriate terms, requirements, ranking charts, and worksheets. As a Standard, this document contains requirements “must” and recommendations “should” to guide the user through the FMEA process. The FMEA process and documentation must comply with this Standard as well as any corporate policy concerning this Standard. Documented rationale and agreement with the customer is necessary for deviations in order to justify new work or changed methods during customer or third-party audit reviews.
Datasets icon
Annotation icon

Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA) and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) and Effects Analysis for Machinery (Machinery FMEA)

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J1739_200208
  • Historical
Published 2002-08-02 by SAE International in United States

This SAE Recommended Practice was jointly developed by DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation.

Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design FMEA) and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process FMEA) Reference Manual

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J1739_200006
  • Historical
Published 2000-06-01
This SAE Recommended Practice was jointly developed by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors under the sponsorship of the United States Council for Automotive Research (USCAR). This document introduces the topic of potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and gives general guidance in the application of the technique. An FMEA can be described as a systemized group of activities intended to: (a) recognize and evaluate the potential failure of a product/process and its effects, (b) identify actions which could eliminate or reduce the chance of the potential failure occurring, and (c) document the process. It is complementary to the design process of defining positively what a design must do to satisfy the customer.

Implementation of Lean Operation User Manual

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J4001_199911
  • Current
Published 1999-11-22 by SAE International in United States
SAE J4001 provides instruction for evaluating levels of compliance to SAE J4000. Component text (Sections 4 to 9) from SAE J4000 is included for convenience during the evaluation process. Applicable definitions and references are contained in SAE J4000. SAE J4000 tests lean implementation within a manufacturing organization and includes those areas of direct overlap with the organization’s suppliers and customers. If applied to each consecutive organizational link, an enterprise level evaluation can be made. SAE J4001 relates the following approximate topic percentages to the implementation process as a whole: SAE J4001 is to be applied on a specific component basis. Each of the fifty-two components tests part of, one, or multiples of the specific requirements of lean implementation. Implementation throughout an organization may be measured by evaluating all of the components. The level of compliance for each component relative to best practice may be used as a reference by an organization to compare itself to current best practice in establishing lean operation. Examples of current best practice are available in SAE publication RR003, Automotive Lean…
Datasets icon
Annotation icon

Identification and Measurement of Best Practice in Implementation of Lean Operation

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J4000_199908
  • Current
Published 1999-08-31 by SAE International in United States
SAE J4000 is a tool to identify and measure best practice in the implementation of lean operation in a manufacturing organization. Implementation of lean operation is defined as the process of eliminating waste exhibited in an organization’s value stream. Best practice in this process is Level 3 conduct as described in the standard’s component statements. A description of the levels of implementation is: A procedure for evaluation and scoring of each component will be included in the SAE J4001 Implementation of Lean Operation User Manual.
Datasets icon
Annotation icon

Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Design (Design Fmea), Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Manufacturing and Assembly Processes (Process Fmea), and Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Machinery (Machinery Fmea)

Automotive Quality and Process Improvement Committee
  • Ground Vehicle Standard
  • J1739_199407
  • Historical
Published 1994-07-01 by SAE International in United States
This SAE Recommended Practice was jointly developed by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors under the sponsorship of the United States Council for Automotive Research (USCAR). This document introduces the topic of potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and gives general guidance in the application of the technique. An FMEA can be described as a systemized group of activities intended to: (a) recognize and evaluate the potential failure of a product/process and its effects, (b) identify actions which could eliminate or reduce the chance of the potential failure occurring, and (c) document the process. It is complementary to the design process of defining positively what a design must do to satisfy the customer.