Your Selections

SMCG47
Show Only

Collections

File Formats

Content Types

Dates

Sectors

Topics

Publishers

Committees

Committee Codes

Integrated Project Processes for Engineering a System

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • SAE1001
  • Current
Published 2018-10-09 by SAE International in United States
This standard is applicable to the engineering or the reengineering of: a Commercial or non-commercial systems, or portions thereof; b Any system, small or large, simple or complex, software-intensive or not, precedented or unprecedented; c Systems made up of hardware, software, firmware, personnel, facilities, data, materials, services, techniques, or processes (or combinations thereof); d A new system or a legacy system, or portions thereof. The requirements of this standard, or a designated subset, are intended to be applied by projects establishing policies and procedures for project implementation of the adopted process and process elements of this standard. The requirements of this standard may be tailored as follows: a Processes – Processes may be tailored to be applicable for a given type of project or system. For example, the System Utilization Processes typically don’t apply for conceptual or prototype systems in the same manner as for full-volume production systems. b Activities – Activities may be tailored to reflect the specific approach established by a project, where the modified Activities still achieve the intended Process Purpose and…
Datasets icon
Annotation icon

Integration Engineering for System Effectiveness

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EQB2
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

Program Managers have considered the subject of effectiveness quantification from three diverse points of view. The first viewpoint, in conjunction with the system effectiveness analyst, is to quantify everything and to consider everything quantifiable into a figure of merit. The result is a numerical decision aid that usually has some undesirable attributes such as oversimplification, non-sensitivity to critical parameters, hidden calculations, and difficulty in exercise of the model. This technique is characterized by mathematical models, computer programs, and attempted optimizations. The second viewpoint, in conjunction with the controller, is to consider the effectiveness as specified and concentrate on cost reduction, This has a danger of formulating all technical problems in terms of cost or economic considerations. This technique is characterized by closely controlled work packages. The third viewpoint, in conjunction with program planning and control personnel, is a distrust of the "numbers game" of the system effectiveness analyst and places a stress on taking all of the management actions that have, in the past, yielded a cost effective product. The result may be a well-run project but could yield a product design that is less than satisfactory for mission success. This technique is characterized by an emphasis on understood and accepted policies, procedures, processes, organizational objectives, and functional plans.

Quantification of Essentiality and Utilization Terms

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EQB4
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States
This report on quantification of Essentiality (W) and Utilization (U) terms extends the scope of the basic expression for system effectiveness (Es = ADC) to include the additional "W" and "U" paramenters needed for the quantification of multi-functioned and multi-missioned systems. Methods and procedures for applying these terms to system effectiveness quantification are discussed and simple examples to demonstrate the principles of usage are included. The need to look at the system being quantified in terms of its level in the mission/function hierarchical tree is explained. The relationships between system elements (hardware, software, and personnel) and performance functions are discussed and illustrated with examples. Two methods for applying the "W"'and "U" weight factors, LOGIC AND (weak link model) and LOGIC OR (degraded operational modes model) are described and examples are shown for these cases.

System Engineering

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • SYSB1
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

The purpose of this EIA Bulletin is to provide a clearer, more definitive description of system engineering in order to promote greater recognition, more effective application, and the further development of this technical discipline that can be shared among systems contractors, subcontractors, engineering institutions, process tool developers and DoD.

Systems Engineering Capability Model

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EIAIS731_1
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

The purposeo f this Interim Standard is to support the development and improvement of systems engineering capability.

System Performance Models

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EQB1
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States
Scope is unavailable.

Support System Analysis

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EQB3
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

The Electronic Industries Association (EIA) G-47 Effectiveness QuantificationCommittee has a basic task to quantify system effectiveness. Since the support parameters underly any prime parameter quantification, the topic of support system analysis is a fundamental one to this basic committee task.

Systems Engineering Capability Model Appraisal Method

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EIAIS731_2
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

This document describes the Appraisal Method (AM ) for the Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM). An appraisal compares an organization's Systems Engineering capabilities against the Specific Practices of the Focus Areas and the Generic Characteristics defined in EIA/731, Part 1.

Systems Engineering

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EIAIS632
  • Current
Published 2016-06-16 by SAE International in United States

This standard defines a total system approach for the development of systems. The standard requires: establishing and implementing a structured, disciplined. and documented systems engineering effort incorporating the systems engineering process; multidisciplinary teamwork; and the simultaneous development of the products and processes needed to satisfy user needs. The systems engineering process is defined generically to facilitate broad application. This standard defines the requirements for technical reviews. The tasks in this standard provide a methodology for evaluating progress in achieving system objectives.

Unit Production Cost Tracking Model UPCT 6

G-47 Systems Engineering
  • Aerospace Standard
  • EDIB1B
  • Current
Published 2016-05-31 by SAE International in United States
This userguide contains a description of the Unit Production Cost Tracking Model for use in design tradeoffs and control and reporting tasks of a Design-to-Cost program. This model is designed to compare two Cost Breakdown Structures (CBS) to show elemental and summary cost differences. The two Cost Breakdown Structures may represent design alternatives, or a target allocation and the current design approach for comparison.