This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Mechanical Properties of Heat Treated Wrought Steels
- Ground Vehicle Standard
- J413_200202
- Reaffirmed
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
The figures in this SAE Information Report illustrate the principle that, regardless of composition, steels of the same cross-sectional hardness produced by tempering after through hardening will have approximately the same longitudinal1 tensile strength at room temperature.
Figure 1 shows the relation between hardness and longitudinal tensile strength of 0.30 to 0.50% carbon steels in the fully hardened and tempered, as rolled, normalized, and annealed conditions. Figure 2 showing the relation between longitudinal tensile strength and yield strength, and Figure 3 illustrating longitudinal tensile strength versus reduction of area, are typical of steels in the quenched and tempered condition. Figure 3 shows the direct relationship between ductility and hardness and illustrates the fact that the reduction of area decreases as hardness increases, and that, for a given hardness, the reduction of area is generally higher for alloy steels than for plain carbon steels.
It is evident from these curves that steels of the same cross-sectional hardness have about the same strength characteristics, so that any one of several different compositions would yield the same results. For some specific application then, the first thing to be determined is what composition is required to obtain proper hardening in the size section involved. This information is not contained in mechanical property charts, but can be determined from published data or by means of a hardenability test. Methods of making this hardenability test and interpretation of the test results are provided in SAE J406b.
Having selected a steel that will through harden in the size section under consideration, the engineer must decide from the service stresses imposed on the finished part what tensile properties are required in the part. These tensile properties may then be converted to hardness values from the figures given here; and from Figure 4 showing the effect of tempering temperature on hardness, the appropriate tempering temperature to obtain this hardness can be selected. In Figure 4 the curves are approximate values to be used as a guide. Carbon steels and lean alloy steels, when fully hardened, will fall slightly below the curves and strongly alloyed steels will fall slightly above the curves.
Figure 4 showing the effect of tempering temperature on hardness is a summary of information contained in a large number of mechanical property charts published by steel companies, alloy suppliers, and users. These charts represent, as do the charts on tensile, yield strengths, and reduction of area, data on all SAE alloy and carbon steels with carbon contents of 0.30 to 0.50%.
Mechanical property values obtained from these few summary figures will be as accurate as the information formerly available in a large number of charts, each representing an individual type of steel. For more exact information it would be necessary to make tests on samples from individual heats of steel.
Recommended Content
| Online Course | Metals Bundle |
| Aerospace Material Specification | Steel, Bars, Forgings, and Tubing 1.05Cr - 0.55Ni - 1.0Mo - 0.11V (0.45 - 0.50C) (D6AC) Vacuum Consumable Electrode Remelted |
Topic
Data Sets - Support Documents
No Datasets Available
Issuing Committee
Carbon and Alloy Steels Committee
The Carbon and Alloy Steels Committee of MTEC develops and maintains SAE Standards, Recommended Practices and Information Reports relating to Carbon and Alloy Steels. Participants in the Carbon and Alloy Steels Committee include OEMs, suppliers, consulting firms, government and other interested parties.
Reference
| Number | Title |
|---|---|
| J1099_201808 | Technical Report on Low Cycle Fatigue Properties Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Materials |
| J406 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.