This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Field Test Analysis Information Report
- Ground Vehicle Standard
- J2372_199912
- Issued
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
This SAE Information Report describes results of testing of the SAE J1746 ISP-Vehicle Standard for the communication of spatial data references between central sites and mobile vehicles on roads. Testing was performed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and its contractors, resulting in a document from which this Information Report has been extracted. Tests were performed by computer analysis and corroborated by field tests with a mobile vehicle.
Topic
Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
TABLE 1 | FAILURE MODES WHEN TRANSMITTING LOCATION REFERENCE INFORMATION | |
TABLE 2 | OCCURRENCE FREQUENCY OF TOPOLOGICAL AMBIGUITIES (LINKS WITH TOPOLOGICAL AMBIGUITIES) | |
TABLE 3 | OCCURRENCE FREQUENCY OF CROSS-STREETS AMBIGUITIES | |
TABLE 4 | DATA ISSUES THAT IMPACT LRMS PROFILE EFFECTIVENESS | |
TABLE 5 | DIFFERENCES IN LEVEL OF COMPLETENESS | |
TABLE 6 | OTHER FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PROFILE EFFECTIVENESS | |
TABLE 7 | DATA SET CODE NAMES | |
TABLE 8 | TYPES OF TEST POINTS FOR LRMS PROFILE TESTING | |
TABLE 9 | POSSIBLE SAMPLING AND WEIGHTING TECHNIQUES FOR COMMERCIAL DATA SET TEST POINTS | |
TABLE 10 | SOME METHODOLOGIES FOR USING THE CROSS-STREETS PROFILE TO IDENTIFY A LINK | |
TABLE 11 | SOME TECHNIQUES FOR MODIFYING LINK MATCHING METHODOLOGIES | |
TABLE 12 | ALTERNATE USES OF THE CROSS-STREETS PROFILE | |
TABLE 13 | FAILURE MODES FOR IDENTIFYING LINKS USING THE CROSS-STREETS PROFILES | |
TABLE 14 | FAILURE MODES USING OFFSETS IN THE CROSS-STREETS PROFILE | |
TABLE A1 | BLANK STREET NAMES IN THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY DATA SETS | |
TABLE A2 | TYPES OF NODES | |
TABLE A3 | TYPES OF CROSS-STREET REFERENCES FOR NODES | |
TABLE A4 | TYPES OF CROSS-STREET REFERENCES FOR LINKS | |
TABLE A5 | LINKS WITH BLANK STREET NAMES | |
TABLE A6 | METHODS OF STREET NAME NORMALIZATION USED IN THE LRMS TESTING | |
TABLE A7 | SOME TRANSLATIONS USED FOR COMMONLY OCCURRING WORDS | |
TABLE A8 | STREET NAME MATCHING USING DIFFERENT METHODS OF STREET NAME NORMALIZATION | |
TABLE A9 | REASONS WHY METHOD 3 NORMALIZED STREET NAMES DO NOT MATCH | |
TABLE A10 | DISTANCE BETWEEN NEAREST NODES IN TEST DATA SETS | |
TABLE A11 | DISTANCE BETWEEN MATCHING NODES IN TEST DATA SETS | |
TABLE A12 | COMPARISON OF CROSS-STREETS MATCHING NODES AND CLOSEST NODES (FREQUENCY WITH WHICH THE MATCHING NODE WAS THE CLOSEST NODE) | |
TABLE A13 | SUMMARY OF TEST METHODS | |
TABLE A14 | CROSS-STREET NODE MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1 | |
TABLE A15 | CROSS-STREET NODE MATCHING, TEST METHOD 2 | |
TABLE A16 | CROSS-STREET LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1 | |
TABLE A17 | CROSS-STREET LINK MATCHING FOR LINKS WITH MIXED RESULTS; TEST METHOD 1 | |
TABLE A18 | LINKS THAT MATCH TO MULTIPLE LINKS, TEST METHOD 1 | |
TABLE A19 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, STREET NAME NORMALIZATION 1 | |
TABLE A20 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, STREET NAME NORMALIZATION 5 | |
TABLE A21 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, WEIGHTED BY LINK LENGTH | |
TABLE A22 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, RESTRICTED TO PRIMARY ROADWAYS | |
TABLE A23 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, RESTRICTED TO SECONDARY ROADWAYS | |
TABLE A24 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, CORRECTED FOR VALENCE 2 NODES | |
TABLE A25 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, TEST METHOD 1, CORRECTED FOR VALENCE 2 NODES AND DEAD-END LINKS | |
TABLE A26 | NODE POINT CHART FOR ADVANCED CROSS-STREETS PROFILE MATCHING | |
TABLE A27 | LINK POINT CHART FOR ADVANCED CROSS-STREETS PROFILE MATCHING | |
TABLE A28 | RESULT BINS FOR ADVANCED CROSS-STREETS PROFILE MATCHING | |
TABLE A29 | CROSS-STREETS LINK MATCHING, "BEST METHODS" | |
TABLE A30 | INCIDENCE OF BLANK STREET NAMES | |
TABLE A31 | STREET NAME COMPONENTS | |
TABLE A32 | DATABASE A FIELDS | |
TABLE A33 | DATABASE B/F FIELDS | |
TABLE A34 | DATABASE E FIELDS | |
TABLE A35 | NAME MATCHING RESULTS FOR GOLETA TEST AREA | |
TABLE A36 | NAME MATCHING RESULTS FOR ENTIRE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA | |
TABLE A37 | TRANSFER RESULTS (FIELD TESTS) | |
TABLE A38 | TRANSFER RESULTS (LAB TESTS) | |
TABLE A39 | LAB AND FIELD RESULTS COMPARED | |
TABLE B1 | INCIDENCE OF BLANK TRIADS | |
TABLE B2 | SCORING OF TRANSFERS | |
TABLE B3 | RESULT SUMMARY TEST SET B (LAB GENERATED SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B4 | RESULT SUMMARY, TEST SET C (LAB GENERATED SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
Unnamed Dataset 58 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 59 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 60 | ||
TABLE B5 | GENERATED POINTS (SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B6 | GENERATED POINTS (TWO POINT INDEPENDENT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B7 | GENERATED POINTS (TWO POINT SIMULTANEOUS TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B8 | FIELD DATA (SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B9 | FIELD DATA (TWO POINT INDEPENDENT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B10 | FIELD DATA (TWO POINT SIMULTANEOUS TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B11 | GENERATED POINTS (SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B12 | GENERATED POINTS (TWO POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B13 | FIELD DATA (SINGLE POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B14 | FIELD DATA (TWO POINT TRANSFER) | |
TABLE B17 | SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, ALL STREETS |
Issuing Committee
Reference
Number | Title |
---|---|
J1746_201910 | ISP-Vehicle Location Referencing Standard |
J2374 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.