This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Systems Engineering Capability Model Appraisal Method
- Aerospace Standard
- EIA731_2
- Issued
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Recommended Content
Aerospace Standard | Systems Engineering Capability Model Appraisal Method |
Aerospace Standard | Systems Engineering Capability Model Appraisal Method |
Aerospace Standard | Software Supportability Program Standard |
Topic
Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Table 2-1 | Labor Requirements for a Complete Appraisal | |
Table 2-2 | Appraisal Phases | |
Table 2-3 | Appraisal Roles | |
Table 2-4 | Findings and Ratings Development | |
Table 2-5 | Process Activity Summaries Organization | |
Table 3-1 | Summary Description of Preparation Phase | |
Table 3-2 | Participants for Preparation | |
Table 3-3 | Participants for Obtain Sponsor Commitment | |
Table 3-4 | Participants for Select Appraisal Parameters | |
Table 3-5 | Participants for Plan Appraisal Details | |
Table 3-6 | Participants for Collect Questionnaire Data | |
Table 4-1 | Summary Description of the On-Site Phase | |
Table 4-2 | Participants for Conduct Opening Meeting | |
Table 4-3 | Steps for Conduct Opening Meeting | |
Table 4-4 | Participants for Familiarize Team with the Appraisal Method | |
Table 4-5 | Steps for Familiarize Team with the Appraisal Method | |
Table 4-6 | Participants for Analyze Questionnaire | |
Table 4-7 | Steps for Analyze Questionnaire | |
Table 4-8 | Participants for Interview Product Leads | |
Table 4-9 | Steps for Interview Product Leaders | |
Table 4-10 | Participants for Consolidate Data from Interviews | |
Table 4-11 | Steps for Consolidate Data from Interviews | |
Table 4-12 | Participants for Interview Practitioners | |
Table 4-13 | Steps for Interview Practitioners | |
Table 4-14 | Participants for Consolidate Data from Practitioners | |
Table 4-15 | Steps for Consolidate Data from Practitioners | |
Table 4-16 | Participants for Develop Preliminary Findings | |
Table 4-17 | Steps for Develop Preliminary Findings | |
Table 4-18 | Participants for Review Preliminary Findings | |
Table 4-19 | Steps for Review Preliminary Findings | |
Table 4-20 | Participants for Develop the Ratings | |
Table 4-21 | Steps for Develop the Ratings | |
Table 4-22 | Participants for Develop Draft Findings | |
Table 4-23 | Steps for Develop Draft Findings | |
Table 4-24 | Participants for Present Draft Findings | |
Table 4-25 | Steps for Present Draft Findings | |
Table 4-26 | Participants for Adjust Draft Findings | |
Table 4-27 | Steps for Adjust Draft Findings | |
Table 4-28 | Participants for Present Final Briefing | |
Table 4-29 | Steps for Present Final Briefing | |
Table 4-30 | Participants for Brief Sponsor | |
Table 4-31 | Steps for Brief Sponsor | |
Table 4-32 | Participants for Conduct Wrap-Up | |
Table 4-33 | Steps for Conduct Wrap-Up | |
Table 5-1 | Summary Description of Post-Appraisal Phase | |
Table 5-2 | Participants for Report Lessons Learned | |
Table 5-4 | Participants for Manage Records | |
Table 5-5 | Participants for Report Lessons Learned | |
Table 6-1 | Program Selection Considerations | |
Table 6-2 | Questionnaire Distribution Table | |
Table 6-3 | Tabular Format Example | |
Table C-1 | Typical Two+Five Day Appraisal Schedule | |
Table C-2 | Labor Requirements for a Two + Five Day Appraisal | |
Unnamed Dataset 54 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 55 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 56 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 57 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 58 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 59 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 60 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 61 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 62 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 63 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 64 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 65 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 66 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 67 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 68 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 69 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 70 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 71 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 72 | ||
Table E-1 | Preparation Tasks for Site Coordinator | |
Unnamed Dataset 74 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 75 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 76 | ||
Table H-1 | Generic Practices Questionnaire | |
Table H-2 | Generic Attributes Questionnaire | |
Table H-3 | FA 1.1 Questionnaire | |
Table H-4 | FA 1.2 Questionnaire | |
Table H-5 | FA 1.3 Questionnaire | |
Table H-6 | FA 1.4 Questionnaire | |
Table H-7 | FA 1.5 Questionnaire | |
Table H-8 | FA 1.6 Questionnaire | |
Table H-9 | FA 1.7 Questionnaire | |
Table H-10 | FA 2.1 Questionnaire | |
Table H-11 | FA 2.2 Questionnaire | |
Table H-12 | FA 2.3 Questionnaire | |
Table H-13 | FA 2.4 Questionnaire | |
Table H-14 | FA 2.5 Questionnaire | |
Table H-15 | FA 2.6 Questionnaire | |
Table H-16 | FA 2.7 Questionnaire | |
Table H-17 | FA 2.8 Questionnaire | |
Table H-18 | FA 3.1 Questionnaire | |
Table H-19 | FA 3.2 Questionnaire | |
Table H-20 | FA 3.3 Questionnaire | |
Table H-21 | FA 3.4 Questionnaire | |
Unnamed Dataset 98 |
Issuing Committee
The G-47 Committee serves as an industry focal point for systems engineering by developing and maintaining standards, coalescing industry positions, preparing and coordinating positions on government policies & practices, and promoting sharing of best practices on the engineering of systems.
Reference
Number | Title |
---|
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.