This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Recommended Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Practices for Non-Automobile Applications
- Aerospace Standard
- ARP5580
- Reaffirmed
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
Recommended Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Practices For Non-Automobile Applications describes the basic procedures for performing a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). It encompasses functional, interface, and detailed FMEA, as well as certain pre-analysis activities (FMEA planning and functional requirements analysis), post-analysis activities (failure latency analysis, FMEA verification, and documentation), and applications to hardware, software, and process design. It is intended for use by organizations whose product development processes use FMEA as a tool for assessing the safety and reliability of system elements, or as part of their product improvement processes. A separate, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, J1739, is intended for use in automobile applications.
Rationale
ARP5580 has been reaffirmed to comply with the SAE five-year review policy.
Recommended Content
Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| TABLE 1 | Example Ground Rules | |
| TABLE 2 | Tailoring Guidelines | |
| TABLE 3 | Common Software Variable Failure Modes (Reference ) | |
| TABLE 4 | 4-Level Military/Government Severity Ranking Criteria (Reference ) | |
| TABLE 5 | 3-Level Aerospace Industry Severity Ranking Criteria (Reference ) | |
| TABLE 6 | 10-Level Automobile Industry Severity Ranking Criteria (Reference ) | |
| TABLE 7 | C Index Probability Values | |
| TABLE 8 | Qualitative Probability Intervals (Reference ) |
Issuing Committee
The G41 Committee is focused on standards and handbooks that take a systems engineering approach to reliability that align best practices of reliability management, design and testing with reliability methods that provide the most value and the least risk in terms of achieving reliable products. The demand for highly-reliable systems/products prompted the development of a ANSI/GEIA-STD-0009 (Reliability Program Standard for Systems Design, Development, and Manufacturing) and the corresponding handbook, TA-HB-009 (Reliability Program Handbook) that specifies a scientific approach to reliability design, assessment, and verification, coupled with integrated management and systems engineering.
Reference
| Number | Title |
|---|---|
| ARP1834 | FAULT/FAILURE ANALYSIS FOR DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT |
| ARP4761 | GUIDELINES AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ON CIVIL AIRBORNE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT |
| ARP926 | DESIGN ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMECA) |
| Advisory Circular 25.1309-1A | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| AdvisoryCircula | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| FMD-97 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| J1739_202101 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| MIL-HDBK-217 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| MIL-HDBK-338-1 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| MIL-STD-1629 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| NPRD-95 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| NUREG-0492 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| RTCA/DO-178B | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| TR-TSY-332 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.