This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Flight Crew Interface Considerations in the Flight Deck Design Process for Part 25 Aircraft
- Aerospace Standard
- ARP5056
- Reaffirmed
Downloadable datasets available
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Issuing Committee:
Language:
English
Scope
This ARP defines recommended flight crew interface design processes and methods for new flight deck designs as well as modifications to the flight crew interface of existing flight decks of transport category aircraft (Part 25), which includes commercial transport aircraft, regional and business aircraft. These processes and methods are intended to be utilized by the design engineers of manufacturers of transport category aircraft or any modifiers to the flight deck system. Modifiers include equipment suppliers, avionics manufacturers, aircraft operators, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), regulatory authorities, or anyone seeking a supplemental type certificate (STC), type certificate (TC), amended TC, field approval, or equivalent approval.
The processes and methods described in this ARP address the integration of human factors/ergonomics, engineering, and flight operations in the design and/or modification of flight crew interfaces. These interfaces provide the flight crew access to the installed systems, using controls, indications and displays, in order to allow them to accomplish the tasks of aviate, navigate, communicate, and manage systems. Included in these processes and methods are considerations for flight crew training, the use and integration of automation, error tolerant designs, and task management.
These processes and methods are designed to yield flight deck designs that are both safe and efficient, in that order of priority. These processes and methods address the issue of creating modifications to existing designs that are compatible with the original intent of the flight deck design.
Rationale
ARP5056 has been reaffirmed to comply with the SAE five-year review policy.
Recommended Content
Topic
Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| TABLE 1 | ||
| TABLE 2 | ||
| TABLE 3 | ||
| TABLE 4 | ||
| TABLE 5 | ||
| TABLE 6 | HIGH LEVEL HUMAN-CENTERED FLIGHT DECK DESIGN PHILOSOPHIES | |
| TABLE A1 |
Issuing Committee
The SAE G-10 Aerospace Behavioral Engineering Technology committee focuses on human factors in all facets of aircraft development and operations. It defines appropriate recommendations that could provide cost effective and efficient operation of aircraft (machine) through the use of aerospace behavioral engineering technology. The group is comprised of 18 subcommittees dedicated to creating, preparing, and maintaining all relevant specifications, standards, and requirements for addressing human factors in aircraft development and operation. These subcommittees include:
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Board G-10D Color Displays G-10G Realistic Training G-10H Head-Up Displays G-10HF Human Factors Flight Deck Design G-10J Charting G-10M Vertical Flight G-10T Laser Safety Hazards G-10MFD Multifunction Displays G-10SVS Synthetic Vision Systems Participants in the SAE G-10 committee include OEMs, suppliers, consulting firms, government, academia, and others across the aerospace and defense industries.Reference
| Number | Title |
|---|---|
| ARP4033 | PILOT-SYSTEM INTEGRATION |
| ARP4107 | AEROSPACE GLOSSARY FOR HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERS |
| ARP4155 | HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN METHODOLOGY FOR INTEGRATED DISPLAY SYMBOLOGY |
| DI-HFAC-80742 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| DI-HFAC-80746 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| DI-HFAC-80747 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| DI-HFAC-81399 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| MIL-HDBK-1908 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
| MIL-HDBK-46855 | This document is not part of the subscrption. |
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards
listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A
redline comparison of the current version against a revision is
accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and
then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist
for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning
with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.